Philosphy is not reality my friend, even a philospher will admit that. Claiming for sure anything in a philosophical sense (ie: claiming it CAN be) is just as wrong as claiming it isnt. But im talking about the definition of the actual word, It's either can or cannot as I've stated earlier.

Your totally missing the point as well,its a simple question (no specious reasoning please) Either god CAN or CANNOT make a boulder so heavy he cannot lift it. Either way he either CAN or CANNOT lift it, either way once again theres only two choices not a myriad of classifications of different actions which would allow it. Omnipotence is impossible as its a human conception of something that is mutually exclusive how about this one then since you can't understand the red blue analogy(or are trying your damndest to get around it) 1 is not 2 no matter how many times you examine 1 it will never be 2 (unless you ADD another 1 and then its not 1 anymore......)

P.s. (im not claiming your close minded, your the one claiming any of us that dont ascribe to your learning are close minded and that your truth is the absolute, sorry man trying to turn it round and pin "your right im wrong" on me as well , is specious).