Quote Originally Posted by Stoner Shadow Wolf
how do you figure a joint would lose more cannabinoids than a bong? there's nothing to trap them, no water.


pipes and joints have to yield more than a bong, it's only logical.


and joints have paper added, so you're getting mroe than pot.


i like pipes and bongs
I don't figure that. I believed otherwise until I read the study.

Edit: Nevermind, I read it wrong. And so did you.

I said joints lose less THC. BUT, if you think about it, I don't see how it makes sense, since a joint is continually burning, and bongs tend to have less smoke escape the bowl.
lateralus Reviewed by lateralus on . Are bongs/waterpipes counter-productive? Are Waterpipes Counterproductive? The study results are obviously discomforting to waterpipe enthusiasts, many of whom prefer the cooler, milder smoke they produce, and have naturally assumed it is also more healthful. Unfortunately, however, the study indicates that waterpipes may actually be counterproductive in increasing consumption of carcinogenic tars. Nonetheless, it is still premature to judge that waterpipes are actually unhealthful, since they may filter out other, non-solid Rating: 5