Results 1 to 10 of 26
Threaded View
-
02-04-2006, 07:13 PM #25
OPSenior Member
In an April News Release, these are the myths of the "myths" that we have to resolve
This finding was based solely on the
Originally Posted by 4100hustla
tar content of cannabis leaves compared to that of tobacco, and
did not take radioactivity into consideration. (Cannabis tars do
not contain radioactive materials.) In addition, it was not
considered that:
1) Most marijuana smokers smoke the bud, not the leaf, of
the plant. The bud contains only 33% as much tar as tobacco.
2) Marijuana smokers do not smoke anywhere near as much as
tobacco smokers, due to the psychoactive effects of cannabis.
3) Not one case of lung cancer has ever been successfully
linked to marijuana use.
4) Cannabis, unlike tobacco, does not cause any narrowing of
the small air passageways in the lungs.
In fact, marijuana has been shown to be an expectorant and
actually dilates the air channels it comes in contact with. This
is why many asthma sufferers look to marijuana to provide relief.
Doctors have postulated that marijuana may, in this respect, be
more effective than all of the prescription drugs on the market.
Studies even show that due to marijuana's ability to clear
the lungs of smog, pollutants, and cigarette smoke, it may
actually reduce your risk of emphysema, bronchitis, and lung
cancer. Smokers of cannabis have been shown to outlive non-
smokers in some areas by up to two years. Medium to heavy
tobacco smokers will live seven to ten years longer if they also
smoke marijuana.
Cannabis is also radically different from tobacco in that it
does not contain nicotine and is not addictive. The psychoactive
ingredient in marijuana, THC, has been accused of causing brain
and genetic damage, but these studies have all been disproven.
In fact, the DEA's own Administrative Law Judge Francis Young has
declared that "marijuana in its natural form is far safer than
many foods we commonly consume."
The disturbing thing about all of this information is that
the majority of Americans are as yet unaware of the radioactive
risk in cigarettes. In fact, many professionals: doctors,
scientists and health administrators, either have never heard of
polonium 210 or consider it to be just another scare story.
Why is this information so hard to come by? When the
studies were first released in the late 70's, many magazines were
unable to print articles because their main advertisers,
cigarette companies, threatened to pull support if they published
the facts. Although network news did pick up the story,
virtually nothing came out in print. Those who heard were hard
pressed to produce collaborating evidence, and were eventually
convinced it was nothing to worry about.
Special thanks to:
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabi..._health2.shtml
Similar Threads
-
3 myths about marijuana
By Galaxy in forum Current EventsReplies: 0Last Post: 05-24-2009, 09:35 AM -
Top Ten Myths About Thanksgiving
By rebgirl420 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 11-21-2007, 09:43 PM -
myths about testing....
By FREEWAYHOBO in forum Drug TestingReplies: 4Last Post: 09-10-2006, 10:53 PM -
14 Marijuana Myths
By beachguy in thongs in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 8Last Post: 12-09-2005, 07:23 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online