Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11222 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33
  1.     
    #11
    Senior Member

    consider this

    i'd rather ours imploded into the atom as the next big bang

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #12
    Senior Member

    consider this

    Quote Originally Posted by Stoner Shadow Wolf
    i'd rather ours imploded into the atom as the next big bang
    maybe that's what the black hole that's gonna suck up the universe is

  4.     
    #13
    Senior Member

    consider this

    could be, except i always figured that black holes were the starting point for new planets...

    that when the black hole finally "fills up", it begins forming a tiny rock.... that slowly continues collecting mass and becoming a planet....

  5.     
    #14
    Senior Member

    consider this

    Quote Originally Posted by opiuser
    no, atoms are made up of electrons, protons, and neutrons, and diff combos make diff elements. and i would think that diff combos of the same energy particles make up protons etc. in the end it all breaks down to pure energy, so the earth is just a big mass of energy

    and i dont think they are little planets, it just is crazy to imagine that it could be

    elctrons, protons, and neutrons aren't elements themselves though, as you said, their combination makes up the element. but one atom, no matter what combination, doesn't make up multiple elements. the combination determines what 1 element the atom will be, then multiple atoms of unique elements can come together to create a molecule, which can be multiple elements. A single atom in itself does not make up a complex system of elements capable of creating a little planet or people on them. besides,electrons/protons/neutrons are just condensed energy.

  6.     
    #15
    Senior Member

    consider this

    good point devious... and we're getting closer...

    i didnt start this thread to make you guys beleive this crazy theory... its just to make youy start thinking.

    ASK WHY, dammit.

  7.     
    #16
    Senior Member

    consider this

    Quote Originally Posted by opiuser
    good point devious... and we're getting closer...

    i didnt start this thread to make you guys beleive this crazy theory... its just to make youy start thinking.

    ASK WHY, dammit.
    sorry, I'm a firm believer now, you have my unquestionable loyalty and need only to point out the infidels for me to smite .

  8.     
    #17
    Senior Member

    consider this

    damn you devious... you ass... lol.

    why must you mock me? do you want me to smite you with my firey wrath??? do you really want me to throw this banana at you?? do you?

  9.     
    #18
    Senior Member

    consider this

    Quote Originally Posted by Stoner Shadow Wolf
    could be, except i always figured that black holes were the starting point for new planets...

    that when the black hole finally "fills up", it begins forming a tiny rock.... that slowly continues collecting mass and becoming a planet....
    Sorry to say, but all objects in our universe form out of large balls of gas and dust or are an end product of the formation of these. Black holes are only formed under extreamly dense conditions. So dense that there are no known forces (pressure) to counteract gravity to prevent the object from collapsing upon itself. There are only 3 ways they can form, from the big bang, the death of massive stars (about 8 times the mass of our sun) in Super nova explosions, and at the center of many galaxies.

    The problem with your idea is that a black hole never "fills up" as it gathers more mass (it dosent acually suck like a vaccume, it works by gravity in the same way as the Earth, Sun any other object with mass.) Once somthing becomes a black hole, there is really no way for it to be reversed because the density is already past the critical. They can, however, evaporate, but it involves some quantum mechanics. (Stephen Hawking proved this.) Matter anti-matter pairs can spontainiously form and recombine (this dosent violate any laws as long as it follows the uncertainty prinicible) but one can fall into the hole and the other can fly off. Matter inside the hole must then be "erased" to allow the other partical to exist. Somthing along these lines.

  10.     
    #19
    Senior Member

    consider this

    hahahahahahhahahahahahaha how the fuck do you know? havew you lived for 40 billion years to study how long it takes for a black hole to fill up?



    everything we know about black holes are idle speculations and theories!

    what proof do you have that a black hole never fills up?



    given that all our science is based on what our five senses tell us... how do we know there isnt anything beyond that that can turn it upside down at the drop of a hat?

  11.     
    #20
    Senior Member

    consider this

    we have very little information on black holes...actually we have speculations of it...its true that they appear after a big supernova and all cause we've seen it...(i think we did) anyway for were the things go from there we dont know but! we do know 1 things and hmmm i think Lavoisier or wathever said this ''Rien ne se perd rien ne se créé'' meaning something like nothing appears or dissapears...so thinking that the black hole erases stuff is probably not it...I sure is hell dont know what happens there....il let my imagination fly on this =)

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook