Quote Originally Posted by MullManiac
Wrong, UV levels are pretty much the same no matter what your altitude is, they dont release energy untill they hit something, so why would they get weaker the further they travel.
As i pointed out about they would grow worse due to the lack of CO2.
Bro, science and problem solving are my specialty. I can back up what I say with various links and quotes so watch it. Booyah. :dance: :thumbsup:
http://www.np.edu.sg/~dept-bio/rdna/...inismfacts.htm
http://zebu.uoregon.edu/text/UV
And a little quote from my man Ed Rosenthal:
UV-B light changes the quality of the bud. Andecdotally, buds grown at high altitude are considered to be better quality that lowland products. The difference in conditions between these locations is the amount of UV-B light they recieve. It is filtered out by the atmosphere so it is more intense at higher altitudes than at lower.
The quality of UV-B will greatly out way the lack of CO2.
As Brian off of Family Guy would say:
Brian: I don't want to say "I told you so", but... YEEEAAAAAAAAAAAHHH! IN YOUR ****ING FACE! IN YOUR ****ING FACE!!! ... I am so sorry...
I think that you confused UV-B (which determines the quality of THC) with UV-A (which doesn't). But you were right about UV-A levels staying pretty much the same no matter of what altitude: http://www.meritcare.com/hwdb/showto...%29&sequence=1