Let's win this now! I have an argument!

[shrox]

I think I have found the argument for medical cannabis. There is a direct analogy to the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. This is from the US CDC site:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/tuskegee/minfo.htm
-----------
Frequently asked questions regarding Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

Q. What period was the study conducted?

A. 1932-1972

Q. Was the study only done in (Macon County)
Alabama?

A. Yes

Q. Were the men purposely infected with the disease?

A. No

Q. Was the Tuskegee community aware of the study?

A. Yes Local black and white physicians were recruited not to treat the men .
Autopsy and physical assessments were done at local hospitals.
A number of faculty and staff of Tuskegee University were involved in the study.

Q. When did the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
become clearly unethical?

A. 1947 when penicillin was the treatment of choice
and readily available.

Q. How did revelations about the study change the
way we do Public Health Research today?

A. Federally supported studies using human subjects
must be reviewed by Institutional Review Boards.
Regulations governing confidentiality were
developed.
Researchers now must get voluntary informed
consent from all persons taking part in studies.


The key question here is:"When did the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment become clearly unethical?

The answer is: "1947 when penicillin was the treatment of choice and readily available.

There are a substantial number of doctors for whom the "treatment of choice" for many ailments is medical cannabis. There are numerous credible studies supporting medical cannabis, many from other first world countries. Penicillin was first discovered by bacteriologist Alexander Fleming at St. Maryâ??s Hospital in London in 1928. It was not until 1939 that Dr. Howard Florey, a future Nobel Laureate, and three colleagues at Oxford University began intensive research and were able to demonstrate penicillin's ability to kill infectious bacteria.

The US government actively seeks to stop research into medical cannabis, thus setting themselves up to charges of unethical behavior paralleling the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. While the government in the vast majority of cases has not purposely caused or inflicted a condition upon the populace, it clearly does stand in the way of a credible and effective treatment, much like it prevented the treatment of the subjects in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, and actively pressured physicians not to inform or treat them for their condition.

shrox

shrox Reviewed by shrox on 07-09-2004. Let's win this now! I have an argument! I think I have found the argument for medical cannabis. There is a direct analogy to the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. This is from the US CDC site: http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/od/tuskegee/minfo.htm ----------- Frequently asked questions regarding Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment Q. What period was the study conducted? A. 1932-1972 Rating: 5

[rnf232s]

That is not a bad point to relate it to other things that have happened like that before and show that what they are doing now is un-ethical. Hopefully something can be done for the medical use in the future cause it is bullshit that nothing is being done.