foreskins

[beachguy in thongs]

I really dont think its true that sex is 10 times better if your uncircumsized, lol.

What about with a crown, Powair??? :stoned:

[KeanBean]

idk bout 10 times better, but its more pleasurable than a circumcised person

[Reefer Rogue]

I'm pretty sure it's a fact that an uncircumsized male has 50 more nerves in his penis then a circumsized male. I'm i'm wrong then whatever...

[slipknotpsycho]

well i don't know how much better as i have always been circumsized (thank god, i'd have to kill a doctor if he chopped my penis when i was old enough to re member the pain) but i've been told by multiple people that it is 10x better (may be an over exaguration, and it may not) without being circumsized. i know it's a fact that, the skin that is cut off durring this holds a LOT of nerves in it that also contribute to it...also there's the fact that the actual head of the dick doesn't get touched too often if skin is covering it, so when it is touched (the right way that is, i'm sure sandpaper on it wouldn't feel too good) it would feel exceptionally better, where as circumsized the actual nerves in the head of the dick get attention pretty much all day (boxers/breifs whatever rubbing against it all day) just food for thought.

[GSW389]

I'm pretty sure it's a fact that an uncircumsized male has 50 more nerves in his penis then a circumsized male. I'm i'm wrong then whatever...

it wouldnt even matter. think of foreskin as like a third arm. if some people have a third arm and another doesnt, its not like the person without the third arm is missing anything cuz they wouldnt have ever had one.

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

it wouldnt even matter. think of foreskin as like a third arm. if some people have a third arm and another doesnt, its not like the person without the third arm is missing anything cuz they wouldnt have ever had one.

um... but every guy is born with a foreskin... they had it at one point! lol

IMO it's disgusting to remove the foreskin, it's mutalating babies!!! :O

[Breukelen advocaat]

um... but every guy is born with a foreskin... they had it at one point! lol IMO it's disgusting to remove the foreskin, it's mutalating babies!!! :O

One of the main reasons routine infant circumcision became popular in Western Society, among people that did not have a tradition of doing it, was because it was said to reduce masturbation. This was ridiculous, but that's what's been claimed since the 1800's. Circumcision is a big money maker for the doctors, and unnecessary except in very rare cases - such as penile cancer in elderly men.

The insurance companies are also to blame, for paying the doctors' fees.

[slipknotpsycho]

lmfao that's ridiculous, i've known plenty of guys that aren't and on average i masturbate 2 or 3x as much as them >.< i only had it done to my son because it is less prone to infection if it's not taken proper care of (i mean it's not like it needs some super special treament or anything but you do need to roll the skin back and clean when you take a shower, and i'd rather not have that discussion with my son when he gets older)

[yocass]

actually circumsized is more prone to infection... because your tearing open the skin etc.. its instinct to clean yourself, so unless you have less than 2 fingers when born, there is no talk necessary.

[deathbyvalley]

IMO it's disgusting to remove the foreskin, it's mutalating babies!!! :O

to you it might be, but in judaism and islam, they're prescribed rituals.