Here's my final take, since you clearly want to talk in terms of debate and such. I think we can both agree that we won't agree. You believe Israel is built on a foundation of terrorism (Or if not, that's what the context implied), and I believe it isn't. You believe Iran's call for Jewish extermination is an act of self-defense and I don't think that's an act of defense.

Truly, I don't know much about the Japanese boat incidents, so I can't argue on its part. About America being founded improperly, I agree with you there.

Ultimately, we you think one way and I firmly believe another which is why I was so quick to get up and arms because it's fairly alarming when you make such a hateful, generalizing comment like, "go back to your Jews, terrorist lover." What's that supposed to make me understand?

I think it's safe to say we firmly agree to disagree on this one.