I infact own Origin of Species and am very intrested in evelution, also you shot yourself in the foot with that link as it shows nothing surgesting that a natural responce to an infection can be termed as evelution. But as for dictionaries these days, did you know google is in the new macquary dictionary (as in the internet site). I guess anything can be classed as a word these days.

And as for my source i do enough of that at uni and i just cant be bothered scaning stuff. Andjust because something is govenment funded doesnt mean its wrong... where else are they gonna get enough money from to fund a reliable experiment.

I'm not sure exactly how many cases of lung cancer a year are caursed exclusivly by smoking cigs but it cant be many, have you got any idea how hard it is to outright prove something lile that? very difficlt soemtimes.

What is the problem with some of you guys here, sure the gov hasnt done everything right but they do what they do in the intrests of the majority of the people, just because the gov said it doesnt make it wrong!

Ps. what does AFAIK mean?

Pps. oh yeah the spelling... i'm dyslexic
MullManiac Reviewed by MullManiac on . Pot not a major cancer risk NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Although both marijuana and tobacco smoke are packed with cancer-causing chemicals, other qualities of marijuana seem to keep it from promoting lung cancer, according to a new report. The difference rests in the often opposing actions of the nicotine in tobacco and the active ingredient, THC, in marijuana, says Dr. Robert Melamede of the University of Colorado in Colorado Springs. He reviewed the scientific evidence supporting this contention in a recent Rating: 5