You may have been tracked by your IP or other ID even if you used the latest CM's

[yocass]

"chatter" by definition, is chatter. Not conspiracy.
A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. One person may be charged with and convicted of both conspiracy and the underlying crime based on the same circumstances.

[JonnyIndica]

The specific chatter I refer to is when two individuals duke it out over a delayed/missing pkg in public. (sorry for not being clear)
Transactions should always reamain private, thats my preference,..thats all.

[yocass]

of course, but talking about a crime is not a crime. There must be steps taken towards the crime, which cannot be proven in this case unless the individual in question is stupuid enough to not deny what he had previously said. "it was a joke" would suffice to get you off, as would "oh I just posted that to piss off other people"

[Cannabis.com]

Your right I had too much free time on my hands last night. I spent it trying to inform you and warn you. I think it's great you think I am an alter ego. But, I was all one person - just me...

Thanks for the warnings

I'll be on the lookout for the jazzed up DHS surveillance truck...

http://cryptome.org/dhs-truck.htm

And the black helicopters; the U.N. is going to take over the world

...Your site is set up to allow Law Enforcement to track it's users directly to thier computer. Make your cash when you can because big brother is world wide and comming right to ya. It may be months or a year - But now that it's in motion it won't be stopped.

Tracking something to one's computer doesn't mean diddly ... and anyways, many folks in the DEA and other law enforcement agencies, privately, wish cannabis was legalized / regulated; they don't need more work chasing tokers ... they'd prefer to focus on more important matters.

Speaking of big brother ... check out the ONDCP website ... no, not that one ... I mean mine at http://www.ondcp.org/

And while on the topic of big brother, they already know where I am ... geez

...Your lack of concern and site security make it that much easier...

This is a publicly accessible site; one should assume all internet activity that one does anywhere is monitored by the government and other entities ... public means just that ... the Marihemp Network gets 10,000+ visitors per day - the secret is out!

...Ban me if you want. The people who have read my posts know I was just looking out for thier best interest. They will understand if I was banned because I was bad for your business.

Speaking of business ... since you really want to help folks here, upgrading to cafe membership would allow you to have a bigger "big brother" avatar and help us cover costs so we may provide this quality service, that you are enjoying for free, to more folks world-wide.

http://boards.cannabis.com/subscriptions.php

Ron

[tokosan]

seriously the man is correct. street credz to ron for knowin the shizz.

i have posted that i plan to rape a donkey, yet i dont see the animal cruelty people at my door.... (kidding )

[beachguy in thongs]

I am very sorry, Ron. I've been abusing my free-membership.

I'm blind.

[tokosan]

hey ron ya know what would really work?


Let cafe members have [img] tag in thier signatures... or maybe even allow them to post it

[tokosan]

hey ron ya know what would really work?


Let cafe members have [img] tag in thier signatures... or maybe even allow them to post it

hey your a cool guy, and correct too!

[Cannabis.com]

...Let cafe members have [img] tag in thier signatures... or maybe even allow them to post it

The IMG tag can be easily abused - ie. folks using it to track users IPs by using IMG to link to an image file and then browsing their log files for all the IPs ... or possibly even going one step further and placing a cookie header in the linked image too for more detailed tracking.

A more practical reason for not allowing the IMG tag is latency - remotely hosted images (IMG tags) require additional remote (DNS) lookups leading to sluggishness for visitors - not allowing the IMG tag greatly speeds things up for visitors.

Ron

[GHoSToKeR]

Good call on the img tags, Ron.. Pretty much every other forum i've visited allow img tags, and they're extremely slow to load (especially on dial up connections) and sometimes people's signature images make the forums look cluttered and annoying.