Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11038 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    The U.S. Supreme Court announced today

    Dear Friend:

    The U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it will hear the Bush
    administration's appeal of a lower court decision protecting medical
    marijuana patients from arrest and jail. The case, "Ashcroft v.
    Raich," stems from litigation funded by the Marijuana Policy Project's
    grants program.

    While we wait for the court to hear and rule on this case, Congress
    will be voting (in about two weeks) on whether to end the DEA's
    attacks on medical marijuana patients. Congressmen Maurice Hinchey
    (D-NY) and Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) will be offering an amendment on
    the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives that would prevent the
    U.S. Department of Justice (which includes the DEA) from spending any
    money to raid medical marijuana patients in states where it's legal.

    Please visit http://www.mpp.org/DD/action.html to fax or e-mail a
    pre-written letter to your U.S. representative today. It's crucial
    for you and other subscribers on this e-mail list to send tens of
    thousands of letters in support of the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment,
    which is MPP's top legislative priority in Congress.

    Back to the Supreme Court: The upcoming "Raich" hearing is only the
    second time in history that the Supreme Court will hear a medical
    marijuana case. The Supreme Court decides to hear and rule on only 1%
    of the cases that are appealed to it.

    The case is an appeal of a precedent-setting victory on December 16,
    2003, when the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal
    laws against marijuana do not apply to sick people who have the
    approval of their physicians to use medical marijuana in states where
    it's legal, as long as the patients' use is intrastate and
    noncommercial in nature.

    As a result of that ruling, Angel Raich and Diane Monson -- the two
    named plaintiffs in the case -- are now legally allowed to use,
    possess, and grow their own marijuana under both California state law
    and federal law. Additionally, other patients in the six Ninth Circuit
    states with laws allowing for the medical use of marijuana -- Alaska,
    California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington -- no longer face
    prosecution under state or federal law if their circumstances are
    substantially similar to Raich's and Monson's circumstances.

    In short, because of the "Raich" victory at the Ninth Circuit level,
    the DEA and John Ashcroft's thugs have been prohibited since December
    from arresting or harassing thousands of patients in six western
    states. The Supreme Court will decide whether to affirm or overturn
    this policy. While a ruling overturning "Raich" would not invalidate
    the protections that patients currently enjoy under state law, it
    would allow the Justice Department to resume the federal government's
    war on patients.

    At issue in the case is whether the U.S. Constitution gives Congress
    the authority to criminalize activities that barely -- if at all --
    involve interstate commerce. In its appeal, the Justice Department is
    claiming that the two patients and their caregivers -- who are growing
    and using medical marijuana within California, using California seeds,
    California soil, California water, and California equipment - are
    somehow engaged in "interstate commerce."

    Oral arguments before the Court will take place this fall, with a
    ruling expected shortly thereafter.

    According to MPP's records, you have not yet made a financial donation
    to MPP (or the tax-deductible MPP Foundation) in 2004. Would you
    please consider visiting http://www.mpp.org/donate1001 to donate $10
    or more today? Our lobbying campaign in support of the
    Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment is costly and time-consuming.

    And, again, if you haven't already, please visit
    http://www.mpp.org/DD/action.html to fax or e-mail your U.S.
    representative in support of the Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment. MPP's
    online system is quick and easy and will take only two minutes of your
    time. The more letters each congressional office receives, the more
    likely it is that the amendment will pass on the House floor next
    month.

    The Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment received a major boost a few days
    ago when several major religious denominations -- including the United
    Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, the Presbyterian Church, the
    Evangelical Lutheran Church, the Union for Reform Judaism, and
    others -- spoke out in favor of medical marijuana access. Please visit
    http://www.mpp.org/states/site/quicknews.cgi?key=7552 to read the
    Washington Post article from Saturday, which featured the Interfaith
    Drug Policy Initiative and a quote from MPP.

    If you agree that sick and suffering patients should not have to live
    in fear of armed federal agents breaking down their doors to take away
    their medicine, please consider visiting http://www.mpp.org/donate1001
    to donate to MPP's work today.

    Thank you,

    Rob Kampia
    Executive Director
    Marijuana Policy Project
    Washington, D.C.



    please show your support in any way you can
    emial you congressmen they will at least know what you want
    by way of the numbers
    its all in the numbers
    peace
    NowhereMan Reviewed by NowhereMan on . The U.S. Supreme Court announced today Dear Friend: The U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it will hear the Bush administration's appeal of a lower court decision protecting medical marijuana patients from arrest and jail. The case, "Ashcroft v. Raich," stems from litigation funded by the Marijuana Policy Project's grants program. While we wait for the court to hear and rule on this case, Congress will be voting (in about two weeks) on whether to end the DEA's Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    The U.S. Supreme Court announced today

    email sent! as well as emails to friends

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    The U.S. Supreme Court announced today

    Quote Originally Posted by teresaj2k
    email sent! as well as emails to friends

    thank you very much
    if nobody tells you
    you just helped millions of people try to get the right
    to smoke weed
    thank you alot,THEY do help
    one of my congressmen used to email me back
    spouting off rectoric about a fucking
    GATEWAY drug
    now he is no longer appossed thanks to him getting Educated about it
    they not For it,but no longer stand Against it
    so that progress is great news ,Few more elections
    we be legal
    i say as one of them millions
    thanks agian for caring,

    peace

  5.     
    #4
    Senior Member

    The U.S. Supreme Court announced today

    ha i got a reply email saying thank you for taking interest in the government and he'll try to find the time to read my email.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 02:24 AM
  2. Another Supreme Court pick for W?
    By amsterdam in forum Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-05-2006, 09:11 PM
  3. Supreme Court Justice Retiring
    By XTC in forum Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-05-2005, 02:14 PM
  4. Supreme Court...
    By looseends in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-06-2005, 07:44 PM
  5. God damn US supreme court
    By mrdevious in forum Legal
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-06-2005, 05:57 PM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook