Quote Originally Posted by oldsanclem
I have ejoyed this led thing and its something to do. Now think, if leds worked , industry would be doing it.
Industry wants the most light for the least cost. Industry wants the most light and lower replacment cost. Industry would stand to gain tillions of dollars saved. And industry still uses 48 in florsents, metal halide and hps.
Funny facts wind power, photo cells have yet to make ONE CENT. :yippee:The average loss is 14-25 cents per kwh. (thanks to the poor people trying to save money)(forget the inviromental problems)
Once again OHMS and WATTS wins, and the poor pay.
Note sky lab florsent lights, even they can not efford leds. They can, but not cost effective. Flat panel florsent lighting. Note they have a $10,000 a pound lift off weight cost:jumphappy:, even at that, its not cost effective. Mars systems cost are more and leds cant make it.
:S2:
Wow, I just read this again.

What a load of negative horse hockey.

Man I hate half-truths and misinformation presented as indisputable fact. When you're spewing all this ridiculous nonsense, it might behoove you to keep in mind that industry is using LED. A lot. All over the place. More and more. Read up a touch before leading the sheep. They can't help it, some of them might believe you.