Results 51 to 60 of 80
-
10-15-2005, 01:05 AM #51Senior Member
free speech
Originally Posted by beachguy in thongs
that was more for theatrics. i did mean what i said about us all having prejudices.
think about it in an early-man survival situation: you're on the plains, doing whatever early man did on the plains. you see a figure appear on the horizon. you have to make a quick determination.
do you scoot back to the village and raise the alarm?
do you approach to engage in trade or what have you?
do you hide and watch what this stranger does?
these decisions would have to be made based on what we see, what we know from past experience, and what we've been taught.
we make an initial snap judgement.
we may be proved wrong later, but we pretty much have it wired in to us to make quick decisions with what info is available.
unfortunately, i think we still do this, even tho' we know better and may reevaluate almost as quickly.
didn't mean to be a dick.
-
10-15-2005, 02:18 AM #52Senior Member
free speech
That's okay, and for your scenario on the hill, it would be a shame to hide from him, for he's only The Fool On The Hill.
-
10-17-2005, 12:46 AM #53Senior Member
free speech
Originally Posted by robert42
On top of that, we should also compare the kinds of comments each group, white and blacks. Whites make comments about blacks that are far more serious in nature, like blacks are "lazy, dirty, stupid", etc. From my experience, blacks tend to make the comments more in "jest", criticizing habits or how white people do things. Which is worse? And When do the black people your referring to say black people are superior to white people? Of course they wouldnt say that, because white people have been keeping them from gaining any power for centuries.
Another thing, when you hear black people making "racist" comments, they're done overtly. People know that its racist. However, when the white controlled media paints black people in a bad light, or any cultural group in the world for that matter (Notice their bias in covering international events), its meant to be taken seriously. Thats a far more insidious kind of racism, wouldnt you agree?
-
10-17-2005, 05:04 AM #54OPSenior Member
free speech
how did this get switched around to racism from free speech? Its all very interesting to see your opinions. Keep up the posts!
-
10-17-2005, 05:14 AM #55Senior Member
free speech
My free speech would cost money.
-
10-17-2005, 10:02 AM #56Senior Member
free speech
Originally Posted by ladyM
with my
"want me to push free speech to the limit" post.
-
10-17-2005, 03:08 PM #57Senior Member
free speech
Originally Posted by Mojavpa
-
10-17-2005, 03:23 PM #58Senior Member
free speech
Originally Posted by robert42
Racism is a classification system. When you classify someone as "black", remember that they have ancestors that grew up closer to the equator than you. I don't know how God split up intelligence geographically, but that's a pretty disturbing measure to downgrade someone. All Eskimos are nothing better than a white...frozen thing if they stay outside too long.
-
10-17-2005, 03:47 PM #59Senior Member
free speech
'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.'
Voltaire (1694-1778)
-
10-17-2005, 04:39 PM #60Senior Member
free speech
Your signature would be racist under my definition REEFSTER ROGUESTER.
cheap Mexican schwag
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Free Speech Wins - DISCLOSE Act Fails
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 07-28-2010, 12:08 AM -
Criminalizing Speech The War on Free Expression
By fishman3811 in forum ConspiracyReplies: 0Last Post: 05-10-2007, 03:23 AM -
Democrats Set To Renew Attack On Free Speech
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 01-03-2007, 11:45 PM -
No Free Speech in Venezuela
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 4Last Post: 03-11-2006, 01:55 PM -
The liberal attack on Free Speech
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 6Last Post: 02-15-2006, 05:56 AM