Fingerprint id scheme in school

[pisshead]

isn't the child's physical existence at school enough to show they are there? of course it is, this is about training kids for life under the global dictatorship, training them that they have to thumbscan everywhere they go, that it's normal...wait for it in all grocery stores and banks and tanning salons and schools, EVERYWHERE, in this country too...to keep you safe from those freedom hating muslims.

Fingerprint id scheme in school

BBC | September 26 2005

Pupils' fingerprints will be used to register and measure attendance at a primary school in Wiltshire.

The school, which prefers not to be identified until parents have been consulted, will use technology already piloted in Singapore.

The head teacher said it would aid self-registration and cut teachers' administrative workloads.

Youngsters will use check-in stations each morning, where the technology will identify and verify who they are.

The parents of any absentees will be notified using text messages on their mobile phones.


The head teacher said: "We will be rolling it out for year five and six.
"It is not to do with truancy - we have a statutory obligation to cut teachers' administrative tasks."

The human rights group Liberty, said the scheme was not a major infringement of human rights.

"But you always need safeguards, particularly around the fingerprint records," a spokesman added.

Jeremy Whittaker, project manager for the scheme, said: "The data will just be used for registration. Like all records, it will be protected under the Data Protection Act.

"The other vital information kept by the school on students - date of birth, address and so on - is potentially more dangerous."

The technology has yet to be installed at the school, but the trial will last until December.

The system has been used by the US Government, banks and in diamond exchange offices, as well as in anti-carjacking devices.

pisshead Reviewed by pisshead on 09-26-2005. Fingerprint id scheme in school isn't the child's physical existence at school enough to show they are there? of course it is, this is about training kids for life under the global dictatorship, training them that they have to thumbscan everywhere they go, that it's normal...wait for it in all grocery stores and banks and tanning salons and schools, EVERYWHERE, in this country too...to keep you safe from those freedom hating muslims. Fingerprint id scheme in school BBC | September 26 2005 Pupils' fingerprints Rating: 5

[eg420ne]

Training them to be good lil slaves..

[Psycho4Bud]

Last thing we want is a deterrent to child abductions!

[stoner spirit]

Yes... we must be good slaves for our masters, barrons, lords, kings, queens, emperors, emperesses, and other nobals, or we will be punnished. We must be good little Roman citizons.

[Psycho4Bud]

Yes... we must be good slaves for our masters, barrons, lords, kings, queens, emperors, emperesses, and other nobals, or we will be punnished. We must be good little Roman citizons.

Ya, and don't forget it!!! Now fetch me up my bong and a sandwich!!!

[hempity]

Thats the massive protest....even larger than Vietnam????
BWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!


Last thing we want is a deterrent to child abductions!


These post are absolutely moronic.
the first one sounds like what a sheep would squall getting fucked for the first time.
the next one proves you swallow, anything the government forces down your gullet. guess its good to know you swallow.

to believe that by fingerprinting you stop abductions is stupid, to believe that because a very small amount of people are criminals, everyone needs to be identified is even more so.
it is no wonder that with people like you loose on the streets, your country is in such dire straits.

[Psycho4Bud]

Thats the massive protest....even larger than Vietnam????
BWWWAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!


Last thing we want is a deterrent to child abductions!


These post are absolutely moronic.
the first one sounds like what a sheep would squall getting fucked for the first time.

And you would know this how???

the next one proves you swallow, anything the government forces down your gullet. guess its good to know you swallow.

No I don't and is this part of that "sheep fetish"?

to believe that by fingerprinting you stop abductions is stupid, to believe that because a very small amount of people are criminals, everyone needs to be identified is even more so.
it is no wonder that with people like you loose on the streets, your country is in such dire straits.

Its wouldn't stop the abduction but it would make it easier to identify a child if they were caught up with.

[pisshead]

that's because you're not a doublethinking neo-con hempity...where big government tyranny fascism/socialism is the answer to everything...

we could solve all crimes if we all had cameras in our houses too being monitored by homeland security for our safety and we all had microchips to prove where we were at every second of every day...watching us, and if we all had to answer to big brother every day to prove we weren't a terrorist that day...that doesn't mean that's the solution...

you don't get safety or security when you give up your rights...you get neither.

any solution to any problem given to us by the feds has to be THE SOLUTION...the neo-cons aren't capable of thinking of anything other than what their neo-con masters give them as a solution...

the irony is...the neo-cons should love bill clinton too...george w. bush is bill clinton on steroids.

[Breukelen advocaat]

I believe that parents, usually fathers, commit many child â??abductionsâ?� because they get sick and tired of the pro-mother/anti-father courts - and the way(s) that the women are raising the children.

Here are the rules that we should have:

Custody of children, in the case of divorce, should automatically go to the father - unless he has shown himself to be unfit to be the primary caregiver.

No parent, who was not married to the other, should have to pay child support - unless they had a legal agreement to do so beforehand.

If "single moms" of illegitimate children cannot support them, and the father does not want to help, the child must become a ward of the state and/or placed up for adoption. No more welfare. Widows are a different story, and should be given help if needed.

Divorces, in the cases of marriage with children, should be more difficult to obtain than they currently are.

If these simple rules of common sense were put into law, everybody would be better off â?? especially the children.

[hempity]

that's because you're not a doublethinking neo-con hempity...where big government tyranny fascism/socialism is the answer to everything...

we could solve all crimes if we all had cameras in our houses too being monitored by homeland security for our safety and we all had microchips to prove where we were at every second of every day...watching us, and if we all had to answer to big brother every day to prove we weren't a terrorist that day...that doesn't mean that's the solution...

you don't get safety or security when you give up your rights...you get neither.

any solution to any problem given to us by the feds has to be THE SOLUTION...the neo-cons aren't capable of thinking of anything other than what their neo-con masters give them as a solution...

the irony is...the neo-cons should love bill clinton too...george w. bush is bill clinton on steroids.

thank you pisshead, you may be partially right, if so, then we must also thank him and others like him, if for no other reason then that he shows us why Christ said "forgive them Father, they know not what they do"

how could they not know????
that has always been a hard one for me, so thanks, what ever your name is, i am sure there is many more just like you out there and at home.
maybe he is mad because of the things, he is made to do to daddy in the closet late at night, just like "gw"had to.
hard to believe he gets stoned though, think it would be really scary in that mind at the best of times.

mitaoyate