If you believed they put a man on the moon, a man on the moon...

[KronicKing]

the first picture is easily explained,it's all,once again,in the angle.in a larger 12x12 like the one i'm stareing at now you can see the objects makeing those shadows on the edge of the photograph,the shoe print is also a lead-on,it's pretty obvious the the shadows are all leaning in the same direction,but the arrows naturaly lead you to think it is not,go to the local bookstore and ask if they have any books or posters of/on the moon landing,it makes it very clear with a picture in front of you,and i have all but one of those pictures they use,so i'll be proveing the,without a dout,wrong one or two at a time as i go though them,BTW folk make no mistake,i'm no bleeding-heart patriot(some of you know i plan on leaveing this country after college and only comeing back maybe twice a year to see family)and i think it's rather ironic that they burnt their own flag while takeing off(that part of this story is true)but i hate to see science made a mockery of by some crack-pot religious man who thinks moses lived 800 years....

[jfoster]

what about that footprint though

[ermitonto]

The "waving flag" is pretty easy to explain too. The flag is attached not only to the vertical pole, but also a horizontal pole at the top, as made clear in this picture (which also shows a few faint stars):
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/as11-40-5874.jpg

[KronicKing]

the last picture is explained by ermitonto,like his article says,most picture were takeing in the early morning and because of the angle(you can test this out tomarrow morning)so,naturaly,the second man's shadow would be taller? correct?

[KronicKing]

thanks for provideing them the picture ermitonto

[robert42]

they didint

thats why there going back in 2018

if they went all them years ago why so long wait?

it will cost them 600billion

did they even have that money back then

[ArtRollins]

The best one is where they did all those missions and forgot to take any pictures of stars. When asked about that in a press interview (which I can make available if you want) the astronauts replied you cant see stars in a vacum. When pressed by a member of the British press if they saw anything out the window as they went? Sorry, we didnt look. Yeah, you flew days to the moon and never bothered to look out.

Well that sure sounds scientific. If light travels easist and fastest in a vacum they want you to believe it is too fast to see?

Of course, all of this is mere speculation unless you can show anywhere in history where a government conned its own people. As we all know, governments are honorable and would never create a lie for any reason. Now, step this way with your wallets wide.

More importantly is why did the Trade Center demolition not get investigated? Science was turned on its head for that lie. A steel and concrete building falls at the speed of gravity into dust and they blame it on fire? How much burning concrete does it take to melt steel anyway? When I worked in the Gary, Indiana steel mills they used coal stoaked furnaces blazing, not just a large tank of lighter fluid to melt steel. And it took years to melt enough to make those towers, yet in 2 hours it turns to dust in an explosion and we fall for it. Amazing.

http://www.911eyewitness.com (has Larry Silverstein admitting on TV that they purposley demolished the building seven! Not explaining how they got the explosives placed on that day to do that - incredible feat of magic) Guiliani on the radio telling everyone how he was away because they warned were warned the towers were about to come down, so they moved operations from building seven (guess he forgot to give that same warning to the fire and police men and woman inside the buildings?) This when never in more than 50 years of steel and concrete buildings has any of them colapsed? Pretty strange that he shows up whenever there is a good bombing in town. The man who gets things done they say.
http://www.911truth.org a good starting point.

The moon is far away, the criminal acts are still happening now here.

[ArtRollins]

they didint

thats why there going back in 2018

if they went all them years ago why so long wait?

it will cost them 600billion

did they even have that money back then

They did not even have computer driven laser lathes to cut the tools. The technology was primitive. To the moon and back so many times and not one star... Thank goodness the race is over and they can actually try to do things really??? That moon stuff sure paid dividends to the subjects of the United States? The money? They never had that, or the 300 billion for Iraq, or 200 billion for New orleans. This is fiat currency, not "money." I will give a trillion (call the presses, keep them printing, no need to earn, just spend). Why care about money when you dont need to earn it? Just make notes (a note is a debt, a Federal Reserve Note is an IOU not money) And dont gawk you EUians, you all have Central Banks owned by the same private credit houses and are no different. Euro is fiat and Bank of England is a private IMF holding.

[hipEstoner]

hmmm, it says all these things that would not happen on the moon as shadows and stars and such,, how would anybody be able to say they know what would happen on the moon if no one has ever been, they say that there should be a crater and stars should be visible and shadows wouldnt have been there, how does anyone be able to say what would happen on the moon if they didnt go, there is no way of knowing if we did or not unless the government says, so i donno

[hipEstoner]

The best one is where they did all those missions and forgot to take any pictures of stars. When asked about that in a press interview (which I can make available if you want) the astronauts replied you cant see stars in a vacum. When pressed by a member of the British press if they saw anything out the window as they went? Sorry, we didnt look. Yeah, you flew days to the moon and never bothered to look out.

Well that sure sounds scientific. If light travels easist and fastest in a vacum they want you to believe it is too fast to see?

Of course, all of this is mere speculation unless you can show anywhere in history where a government conned its own people. As we all know, governments are honorable and would never create a lie for any reason. Now, step this way with your wallets wide.

More importantly is why did the Trade Center demolition not get investigated? Science was turned on its head for that lie. A steel and concrete building falls at the speed of gravity into dust and they blame it on fire? How much burning concrete does it take to melt steel anyway? When I worked in the Gary, Indiana steel mills they used coal stoaked furnaces blazing, not just a large tank of lighter fluid to melt steel. And it took years to melt enough to make those towers, yet in 2 hours it turns to dust in an explosion and we fall for it. Amazing.

http://www.911eyewitness.com (has Larry Silverstein admitting on TV that they purposley demolished the building seven! Not explaining how they got the explosives placed on that day to do that - incredible feat of magic) Guiliani on the radio telling everyone how he was away because they warned were warned the towers were about to come down, so they moved operations from building seven (guess he forgot to give that same warning to the fire and police men and woman inside the buildings?) This when never in more than 50 years of steel and concrete buildings has any of them colapsed? Pretty strange that he shows up whenever there is a good bombing in town. The man who gets things done they say.
http://www.911truth.org a good starting point.

The moon is far away, the criminal acts are still happening now here.

lol, do you even know how much fuel airplanes of that size carry ne way?, u saw the airplanes fly into the building and a huge fireball come out, u dont think all that steel could have melted under those tamperatures, lol, u must be a dumbass