Actually plenty of things have been brought to the table to "Prove" certain gods dont exist. For instance "God" (known by definition as the "biblegod" the one who supposedly spawned Christ). Go to www.evilbible.com for hundreds of them.....

To say NO "godlike" being could ever exist is stupid and no scientific person would say that. We dont know the full limits of our universe however that doesnt mean we state that everything we don't understand was/is "God" that would be counter productive and ignorant (ironically ignorant is a synonym with the definition's of faith )......We investigate and collect evidence, without any the conclusion can only be reached that it isnt there. Until you have evidence belief in something is rather silly in all reality.


There isnt really a scrap of evidence that the Loch ness monster doesnt exist other than that MOST photos are exposed as frauds others are "unexplainable" does this mean nessie is there?

Occam's razor, it's nice to dream but try to stick to reality with your head in the clouds you tend to trip over people who you can't even see.

There is no evidence for gods or sugar plum fairy's or leprechauns does that mean they can't exist? nope....Does it mean they do exist nope.....so whats the logical next step....?

Would you convict someone on hearsay conjecture rumour and assumptions? With zero actual evidence? I hope not but if so I guess your belief system is justified however "unjustly" it is in the end .