Results 1 to 8 of 8
Threaded View
-
09-20-2005, 05:22 AM #7
Senior Member
img and signatures
The IMG tag can be easily abused and track and log visitor IPs; present a potential security risk for visitors.
IMG tags would certainly save much bandwidth, but would greatly increase latency - more specifically, annoying pauses while the visitor's web browser resolves the domain, when applicable, of each linked image, establishes a connection to each resource, and retreives the data, potentially from various far-flung servers / networks; defeats the benefits of pipelining and other various speed enhancing tweaks.
In a nutshell, IMG tag is purposedly disabled for a better visitor experience - not allowing IMG tag eliminates many latency issues, enhances privacy / security, etc.
Ron
Similar Threads
-
SIGNATURES
By highallthetime in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 5Last Post: 08-20-2007, 07:25 PM -
I want to get signatures!
By choppile420 in forum ActivismReplies: 7Last Post: 08-11-2007, 03:56 PM -
signatures?
By thisisthepart in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 3Last Post: 07-11-2007, 10:50 PM -
My Signatures
By healthy_ganjaForest in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 8Last Post: 05-04-2007, 06:38 PM -
Signatures.
By GHoSToKeR in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 61Last Post: 07-03-2005, 07:37 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online