Results 1 to 10 of 53
Threaded View
-
09-14-2005, 03:06 AM #18
OPSenior Member
Giving the president authority for a preemptive nuclear strike!
My understanding is they want the US and its allies out of the middle east. They wanted us out of Saudi Arabia and that's what 9/11 was over. We should have immediately pulled out of Saudi Arabia after 9/11 that's my opinion. Now some of you would say that's answering to the terrorist but hell I think it wasn't just the terrorist that wanted us out of there.
Originally Posted by Juggalotus17
Now If we were to nuke somebody it will for sure come back and bite us in the ass. So we nuke the country and they can't nuke use back so we would be safe right, wrong. People living in other parts of the world would retaliate maybe not with nukes but definitely other forms of violence. They are not just going to sit back and watch us nuke there homeland. A guy from slashdot.org said it the best.. Nukes are 1940s technology it's time we learned how to get along.
Similar Threads
-
FBI: Bin Laden Wants to Strike U.S. Cities With Nuclear Weapons
By Breukelen advocaat in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 05-27-2007, 03:18 AM -
Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran
By BlueCat in forum PoliticsReplies: 27Last Post: 01-11-2007, 01:39 PM -
Iran president says West nuclear concern a "big lie"
By Gumby in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 05-10-2006, 03:43 PM -
Preemptive Censorship at the BBC
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 02-17-2006, 08:07 AM -
French president Chirac threatens nuclear retaliation in the event of terrorist attac
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 01-24-2006, 05:30 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online