Results 1 to 10 of 53
Threaded View
-
09-13-2005, 02:05 PM #11
Senior Member
Giving the president authority for a preemptive nuclear strike!
You thought, no you BELIEVED that Iraq did have weapons of mass destruction, and you were wrong.
So to nuke a country on the BELIEF that they don't have weapons of mass destruction with which to retalliate would be taking a very big risk indeed. That's all i'm saying.
Pressing that fabled Big Red Button could be the end of the US.
I'll ask again, why would you want to risk that?
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
FBI: Bin Laden Wants to Strike U.S. Cities With Nuclear Weapons
By Breukelen advocaat in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 05-27-2007, 03:18 AM -
Israel planning a nuclear strike on Iran
By BlueCat in forum PoliticsReplies: 27Last Post: 01-11-2007, 01:39 PM -
Iran president says West nuclear concern a "big lie"
By Gumby in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 05-10-2006, 03:43 PM -
Preemptive Censorship at the BBC
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 02-17-2006, 08:07 AM -
French president Chirac threatens nuclear retaliation in the event of terrorist attac
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 01-24-2006, 05:30 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online