Giving the president authority for a preemptive nuclear strike!

[Melton420]

peace is sopmething we will never have, but armageddon is comming, and you need to repent and start praying, love and believe .... jesus is real.

[BobBong]

Jesus is real.. he's in my closet.

[stonerpoet]

This is what happens when you elect a jack ass to be our president

[mrdevious]

peace is sopmething we will never have, but armageddon is comming, and you need to repent and start praying, love and believe .... jesus is real.

yes yes melton420, jesus and armageddon are coming, you've told us many a times. just like they were coming according to every person at the beginning/end of every millenium, century, war, incident, political, or societal change. I was under the impression, however, that this was supposed to happen a thousand years after jesus, not 2 thousand. unless it just plain slipped gods mind last time.

as for this pre-emptive (sp?) nuclear strike stuff, it's bullshit. no person in the world should be given that type of power. I'm starting to feel like I'm just watching to fundamentalist nations fight, one christian and the other muslim (and perhapse a 3rd communist in the future). It doesn't matter how high and mighty and morally pure the US government thinks they are, we're allowing a nation to decide who's right, who's wrong, and who's to be removed or put in place, in accordance with their code of ethics and religious beliefs.
and now we're getting more and more policies in supposedly democratic nations that aren't far from fanatical themselves. like the US and Britain now having the authority to arrest people without charge so long as they're suspected to be a terrorist.

[doomfreak]

USA blows... let's all just move to canada....

The USA sounds good on paper...
Canada may be officially England's bitch, but practically speaking is really looking like it would be a much more favorable place to live.

[amsterdam]

damn,,,,,,a bunch of knee-jerk hyterical babies around here.

peace through superior firepower.

[daZenfmeister]

Nukes give me the willies, I laughed in class when I was watching that one movie about the making of the first ones, they were testing it and they said. Well it will either ignite the air and we'll all die, or it'll fizzle and pop. Soo hmmmm it will either end life and existence as we know it or it WONT work. They knew what it was supposed to do.

Kinda crazy if you actually think about it. Why would ANYONE take that kind of risk? Especially since they KNEW that the war could've been won by conventional means? I think they should've made the pre-emptive strike to save millions and millions of lives, because the cost of lives to end WWII conventionally would have been far less than all the people that will die in an instant if terrorists ever got ahold of a nuke.


Also arent we supposed to be worried about the TERRORISTS!?!?!?! It wasn't a country that attacked us or london it was a terrorist group so why is everyone all of a sudden talking about pre-emptive stikes against countries? They may be harboring terrorists but we cant kill terrorists with nukes without reducing every country in the world to radioactive rubble. Does everyone just not see this? Either way we lose:

1. We nuke a country that is/has harboured terrorists. We make alot of other countries very mad at us and will most likely get nuked back.

2. We nuke a few big groups of terrorists, all of a sudden every terrorist cell in the allied countries start blowing shit up. Imagine if every extremist, insurgent, terrorist just went to a large building, gas station, major gas line with a homemade explosive and set it off.



The only way we do this is by slowly eradicating terrorist and their leaders (not by a fullscale war like Iraq or Afghanistan). I think thats the best way to 'minimize' the damage.

[amsterdam]

the context of the pre-emptive strike was talked about in regards to using bunker buster nukes to destroy buried weapons.the rest is knee jerks.nothing more.

[Juggalotus17]

This is what happens when you elect a jack ass to be our president

Please. Now honestly, do you think Bush being the president effects Iran's stance on nuke's? President Bush isn't here to ruin the world, i don't give a fuck how much you believe it either. I know for absolute fact he is a good man, and if peace was an option we'd have it.

You have to understand that there are people in this world that would laugh and smile, jump up and down and celebrate with their friends and family to see you, an innocent civilian, shot up with sixteen rounds from an AK-47 just because you walk on American soil. Or just because you're country isn't an arab country. They want you dead because you're not willing to die for Allah, and destroy the infidel. They are sick, brainwashed, and pathetic.

Most of the people doing the suicide bombings TRULY believe they'll get their seven virgins and an eternity with Allah or whatever when they die for their cause.

But please, don't get the idea all Arabs and Muslims are hostile, and crazy. There is a small percentage of muslims that believe this, and they're the extremists. The religion of Islam is that of peace, love, and all that cute shit.

now, in closing:

STOP BLAMING EVERYONES FUCKING PROBLEMS ON PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU'RE STUCK WITH HIM TILL '08! SUCK IT UP, BE A MAN, AND DEAL WITH IT. MAKE THE BEST OF IT!!!

[tokosan]

Israel,cannot allow Iran to git nukes..period. The mullahs of Iran,already have their NBC bunkers to escape to and they will consider their populace to be useful as martyrs,as soon as they have enough nukes,to accomplish their military and political goals,they will use them against Israel.

So true, Torog. They really ought to just go ahead and get it over with while they have the overhwelming military might.

With all the fickle "peace-loving" people in the US, its doubtfull whether we will be as good an ally to them as they have been to us in the future.

So... fuck you Iran, by being assholes you make yourself a target!