I completely agree. If indeed a physician really did tell a woman that "it doesn't hurt the baby at all to smoke weed in moderation" (and I'm not sure I believe a qualified doctor would say that), he's a fool at best. Doctors don't fully know how weed affects babies in utero because no one is irresponsible enough to do any large-scale tests on pregnant women. The small studies and tests that have been done seem persuasive that women should abstain from smoking while they're pregnant and lactating. That period doesn't last forever, but sometimes mothers are so self-centered that they can't put their own grass use aside temporarily to benefit their babies.

There are plenty of people who justify weed and alcohol use during pregnancy to try and make it OK. Just as there are plenty of non-pregnant people who justify meth use and various criminal behavior of other kinds in the same way. Just because they can justify it for themselves doesn't make it OK--and doesn't make it right for their babies. The lucky pregnant weed smokers have babies with no apparent negative effects. But why would someone risk that in the first place?