ha haâ?¦you said that all fucked up, but I think I know what you mean (not making fun, I thought it was funny)

First of all your percentagesâ?¦..95% and 25% equal 120%

Then I think you meant to say that he has a way better chance that the dog would be a bomb dogâ?¦.and not a drug dog.

And you are right about the dog thingâ?¦..â?ťIFâ?ť there is a drug dog on duty they will more than likely have him working luggage in the back. (individuals are more likely to hide drugs in their luggage rather than on their person because if it is in their pocket it is harder to deny.)

Air ports are putting their money into security not drug prevention. (unless your flying to some place like Thailand)

But delâ?¦.is right,

Donâ??t take unnecessary risks.

Lol, I think when he said chance of dogs he meant that the chance of there being dogs is 5% compared to the chance of there not being dogs, 95%.

And then the 25% was in another ratio. Im guessing it was 25% chance of it being a drug dog compared to the 75% chance of it being a bomb dog.

Meaning the odds are good.

I'm really stoned I just thought I was right.