Are these signs?

[GHoSToKeR]

The fact of the matter is, just because someone cannot be explained scientifically DOES not mean there are supernatural forces at work. It's that simple. Why don't you get it?

[beachguy in thongs]

The fact of the matter is, just because someone cannot be explained scientifically DOES not mean there are supernatural forces at work. It's that simple. Why don't you get it?

Let's break it down:

Just because someone cannot be explained scientifically
(which is what physiologists are for)
DOES NOT
mean
there are supernatural forces at work.

So, if the first one is true, is the second one, then?

[mrdevious]

Let's break it down:

Just because someone cannot be explained scientifically
(which is what physiologists are for)
DOES NOT
mean
there are supernatural forces at work.

So, if the first one is true, is the second one, then?

1. "someone" was a typo

2. you have a very strange way of interpreting things.

[MyAntiDrugIsAmy]

I'm lost, but who was the scientist who formulated all the hurricanes and laid the groundwork for earthquakes?

some crazy fuck

[MyAntiDrugIsAmy]

50% chance? I wouldn't say that. god it just a theory that gained popularity, but there's still no evidence of a supernatural being. There's no more chance of a god than the explanation that the universe is ruled by omnipitant gremlins, underwater sea people that are invisible, magical fairies etc. not knowing the answer opens the doors to infinite explanations without evidence, which makes the existence of god a 1 in infinity chance, the same as my omnipitant gremlin theory and all others.

all those omnipitant gremlins and magical fairies are a part of supernatural if they aren't scientific. i think they were just saying that there could be a scientific explanation and there could be a supernatural explanation. and there are a lot of people who get supernatural feelings and intuition and the paranormal etc. and also a lot of scientists, and if each groups are exploring and learning more about what their faith is in, i think that will lead to the right discovery. this debating is actually kinda healthy if no one takes offense.

[GHoSToKeR]

yeah, beachguy, that was a typo, I was screwed. Leave me alone. lol

[beachguy in thongs]

Sorry, Stoker, but I wasn't the one screwing you!

[Mojavpa]

Let's break it down:

Just because someone cannot be explained scientifically
(which is what physiologists are for)
DOES NOT
mean
there are supernatural forces at work.

So, if the first one is true, is the second one, then?

Just because something cannot be explained scientifically does not necessarily mean there are supernatural forces at work. Maybe that is what Ghosttoker meant. If something can be be explained scientifically, it doesnt matter if there are supernatural forces at work because we already know the scientific explanation.

[beachguy in thongs]

Just because something cannot be explained scientifically does not necessarily mean there are supernatural forces at work. Maybe that is what Ghosttoker meant. If something can be be explained scientifically, it doesnt matter if there are supernatural forces at work because we already know the scientific explanation.

It didn't matter what Stoker meant, I was just messing with him.
I figure these debates are always gonna wind up as inconclusive, so I'll just watch.

[weirdo79]

Small point which seems to have alot of creationists panties in a bunch. We did NOT evolve FROM apes or monkeys....we share a common ancestor. Transitional Species people and Observed Speciation . Read up on em, Dinosaurs also never died out their called birds and lizards now.....and mammals in some parts......The only ones that did were the "big boys" .

Rant done....(although it seems to be a repetitive one as fundies never do the research...)