Just a thread about how I feel

[brrg744]

Just how I feel about everything \/ \/ \/ \/


FUCK MUSIC.FUCK ART.FUCK COMERCIALISM.
FUCK POLITRIX.FUCK FREEDOM.FUCK UNIFORMS.
FUCK UNITY.FUCK TV.FUCK PC.FUCK RADIO.
FUCK AUTHORITY.FUCK CLASS.FUCK VIOLENCE.
FUCK PACIFISM.FUCK GREED.FUCK $.FUCK PRIDE.
FUCK HERITAGE.FUCK CONSUMERISM.FUCK TERRORISM.
FUCK GUN CONTROL.FUCK GLORY.FUCK FLAGS.
FUCK IT.FUCK ME.FUCK YOU.FUCK EVERYTHING.

any comments?

brrg744 Reviewed by brrg744 on 08-29-2005. Just a thread about how I feel Just how I feel about everything \/ \/ \/ \/ FUCK MUSIC.FUCK ART.FUCK COMERCIALISM. FUCK POLITRIX.FUCK FREEDOM.FUCK UNIFORMS. FUCK UNITY.FUCK TV.FUCK PC.FUCK RADIO. FUCK AUTHORITY.FUCK CLASS.FUCK VIOLENCE. FUCK PACIFISM.FUCK GREED.FUCK $.FUCK PRIDE. FUCK HERITAGE.FUCK CONSUMERISM.FUCK TERRORISM. FUCK GUN CONTROL.FUCK GLORY.FUCK FLAGS. Rating: 5

[NightProwler]

fuck people who have a problem with my decisions. THEYRE MY FUCKING DECISIONS!

[ermitonto]

I agree that some of those things are undesirable, while others are very good things for our society (PCs, radio, music, art, unity, freedom, me...). Anyhow, the best way to make your ideas understood is not to just yell FUCK EVERYTHING, but rather to explain why you disagree with something. Also, you should be promoting something else instead. Simple rejection of Establishment values won't make Establishment values go away; we need to replace them with something else. If you make an ideology of negatives, only condemning things but never approving of them, nobody will take you seriously since you have not illustrated your idea of how things might be better than they are now.

For example, the idea "FUCK PACIFISM" might be more convincingly construed as "I disagree with the ideology of pacifism because it rejects the notion of violence as a means of self-defense, and if I never practice self-defense I could die or be forced to submit to the will of someone who is willing to use violence." Some of your other arguments, however, are too vague to be made into a logical statement (like "FUCK IT" and "FUCK YOU"), while some would be quickly demolished if you tried to seriously defend them in a debate. For instance, what's wrong with unity and freedom? And how can you say FUCK FREEDOM and FUCK AUTHORITY? Only authority can deny someone of freedom, therefore without freedom you necessarily have authority.

[mf greg]

owned

[tokosan]

thats fucking solid son, keep them tight beatz a comin, us brothas down here be needen some of that LIBERATION! Yeah yeah fight da powah!

[ImStonedNILikeIt]

Very well said ermitonto. I applaud you of your intelligence on this subject,

[highjinx]

Just how I feel about everything \/ \/ \/ \/


FUCK MUSIC.FUCK ART.FUCK COMERCIALISM.
FUCK POLITRIX.FUCK FREEDOM.FUCK UNIFORMS.
FUCK UNITY.FUCK TV.FUCK PC.FUCK RADIO.
FUCK AUTHORITY.FUCK CLASS.FUCK VIOLENCE.
FUCK PACIFISM.FUCK GREED.FUCK $.FUCK PRIDE.
FUCK HERITAGE.FUCK CONSUMERISM.FUCK TERRORISM.
FUCK GUN CONTROL.FUCK GLORY.FUCK FLAGS.
FUCK IT.FUCK ME.FUCK YOU.FUCK EVERYTHING.

any comments?

man thats a lot of fuckin fucks.

[NowhereMan]

just one

fuck it running

[st0n3r]

Just how I feel about everything \/ \/ \/ \/


FUCK MUSIC.FUCK ART.FUCK COMERCIALISM.
FUCK POLITRIX.FUCK FREEDOM.FUCK UNIFORMS.
FUCK UNITY.FUCK TV.FUCK PC.FUCK RADIO.
FUCK AUTHORITY.FUCK CLASS.FUCK VIOLENCE.
FUCK PACIFISM.FUCK GREED.FUCK $.FUCK PRIDE.
FUCK HERITAGE.FUCK CONSUMERISM.FUCK TERRORISM.
FUCK GUN CONTROL.FUCK GLORY.FUCK FLAGS.
FUCK IT.FUCK ME.FUCK YOU.FUCK EVERYTHING.

any comments?

fuck you

[nakedgunner]

lol