Hmm. I smoke blunts, and they tend to burn really really slowly between hits. I would say that less smoke comesoff one of those babies than from a joint, which is always wasting smoke. Thus, blunts are better than bongs.

Personally, I get a better high off of blunts or joints than off a bong. So I would subscribe that a portion of the psychoactive THC is taken away by the water. True or not, that's how it works for me. I'm a lot higher off a joint or blunt than if I smoke the same amount in a bong.

Anyway, who says you have to smoke an entire blunt? When I use a Cyclone wrap, I may take 5 or 7 hits off of the blunt, start to feel good, then just stick it back in the tube and put the cap on it. It goes out, and I can fire it up later whenever I feel like it. Plus, I think whatever you waste - which, again, when smoking a blunt, is not a lot - is more than made up for with the ultra-potent roach. The last hits from a blunt are better than anything from a bong.

Another aspect of the bong is that it makes my sick to have to scrape that motherfucker and change the water. That, friends, is often too much work. And smoking resin? Fuck that shit; I hate resin. Which is not to say that I won't smoke it if I'm out of weed and need a buzz, but the stuff just makes me ill. I hate the smell and taste, and my lungs hurt like a motherfucker if that's all i'm smoking.

To sum up, you can conserve just as well with a blunt as with a bong, so I'll go for the blunt over the bong 7 days a week. I just get more of a body high (which makes me very quiet and wanting to curl up on the couch and watch T.V) from the bong, and more of a head-rush and social high from a blunt or a joint.

In short, no I don't find that bongs save more, and I think they tend to fuck up my high.

Blunts 4 Life!