Once again said tests were done with "were you exposed too..." (also both sites use the logical assumption that since there is chemicals in ciggarette's and more carcinogenic agents in said chemicals then say that one factory(ignoring the other 50 within a few miles) down the street that you have a higher chance of contracting the disease THUS a large number of people MUST have contracted it specifically from that source. (despite lack of physical evidence ie: Assumption and Supposition). Every other branch of research I've heard of requires more stringent results sorry(well except religious studies of course...).I know Health sources tend to fib a bit though , Think about how many of them still rail against Cannabis as a medicine.

Placebo's have over a 50% rate of success in curing almost anything.....When it comes to medicine take it with a grain of salt.

I deal with biopsy studies or at least those that prove beyond a reasonable doubt. I certainly would not convict a person based solely on circumstantial evidence. If theres a chance (even 80% according to an obscure formula...which doesnt test out mathematically) that he did it, but no physical evidence backed up by logical reasoning I'm not going to convict....

I'd try an experimental procedure to save myself , but I would never ask anyone to do so themselves...

Also blaming tobacco over pollution at such a wide margin considering exposure is farcical in the extreme. I'm no genius but I am a bio grad and it doesnt add up at all.
weirdo79 Reviewed by weirdo79 on . How many people are actually killed by drugs? This has probably been posted many times before but I think it deserves a repeat..... The number of drug deaths in the US in a typical year is as follows: Tobacco kills about 390,000. Alcohol kills about 80,000. Sidestream smoke from tobacco kills about 50,000. Cocaine kills about 2,200. Heroin kills about 2,000. Aspirin kills about 2,000. Rating: 5