Results 51 to 60 of 65
-
08-25-2005, 01:42 PM #51
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
it was designed to lose the war in vietnam...it was meant to a protracted war...war is a business. how else would the military industrial complex get more and more and more power and funding.
kill zone by col. craig roberts is just one book about this...you should read it torog. i'd mail you a copy if you want.
not to mention, the gulf of tonkin never happened! the LBJ library released the phone recordings of LBJ. we attacked our own ship in order to start a war...
gee, where have we seen this happen before...
-
08-25-2005, 11:36 PM #52
Junior Member
Bush's War on Pot
Stop right there. Did you ever consider seeking legal assistance? This was clearly an illegal entry and grounds for a lawsuit. The fact is that all 911 calls are documented and recorded, so if you were to issue a supena on the non-existent records the police would be screwed and forced to settle.
Originally Posted by BlueCat
Now why would that seem shocking or be a surprise anyone? Like you said thereâ??s a war on drugs and military doctrine infers that to use the enemies resources to better enable completion of your own objectives while frustrating the enemies efforts to do the same.
Originally Posted by BlueCat
As for the rich feeding off of the poor, well if by rich you mean the government then we are all victims of this injustice. (since Iâ??m anti-statist I agree, sort of)
Elect new bosses you say? Somehow I doubt that alleviate the situation seeing as this is a two party system and those tyrants that think us undeserving of property rights wear black robes and are not elected by the people.
Originally Posted by pisshead
We children of liberty are doomed to become adults enjoying complicity with tyranny. Reasoning behind my assertion, see above + Iâ??ll start another thread later to discuss this in more detail.
Originally Posted by BlueCat
The tyrants have spoken and they do not favor the local governments, so unfortunately such 'local' efforts are likely to be relatively fruitless especially when it comes to drug legalization.
Originally Posted by pisshead
Torog after reading some of your posts on this site I have come to the conclusion that some of your confidence in the executive(Bush) is well, misplaced. Bushâ??s #1 priority should be to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States of America. Based on some proposals from the executive, such as, operation TIPS, and the Domestic Security Enhancement Act I think itâ??s safe to say Bush is not fulfilling his duties via acceptable means. My opinion being a bit harsh in this regard is that Bush is a vacuous leader blinded by the ideals of his own arguably righteous motives, and it is that blindness that makes him a man of diabolical means. The scary thing is we have had presidents who have acted in a similar manner before, and who are considered some of the greatest presidents we have ever had.
Originally Posted by Torog
And it seems that now I have to go, but Iâ??ll bb to finish what I started, soon.
-
08-27-2005, 02:54 AM #53
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
Originally Posted by BlueCat
she's right, psycho. fuck bleeding-heart med mj. its a right for ALL humans to enjoy. i have a canadian cannabis card, but i still smoke up because i enjoy smoking weed. the dea has no right to tell me i cant do that.
the big fucking dea. they dont worry about anything except snatching up some college kid walking home from a party, so they can go and eat their doughnuts and helped eradicate scum from the earth.
id love to see them try that shit in compton or some poor black/latino/chino/whatever ghetto. big fucking men. gimme a break. its all a sham.
-
08-27-2005, 02:59 AM #54
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
Originally Posted by BlueCat
hell yeh this is some serious shit. im not interested in travelling to america to liberate pot smokers freedom, but if the government of my country came to my door talking shit about how theyre gonna take my weed, thats the day before you read a headline talking about how nicholas stanko died with a gun in his hands.
dont fuck with me, government gary. ill make hell seem like heaven while stoned
-
08-27-2005, 03:01 AM #55
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
jesus christ psycho, sometimes i think youre undercover dea or cia or some shit. you talk like a spook trying to get info on a grow op or somthin/
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
-
08-27-2005, 03:15 AM #56
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
Originally Posted by Torog
How far back does your brain go, torog? do you think radical islamic terrorists have been popping up only after clinto got into power? there was a president bush resideing before him. in fact i think it was the same one lording over the gulf war....hmmmm.....
bush sr. didnt bother getting rid of saddam, just gave him a spanking and left him alone. saddam got the message and kept to himself. years later, the time for the scapegoat to serve its purpose came, and we have yet another war.
yep...lets blame it all on clinton....
-
08-27-2005, 03:19 AM #57
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
total legalisation is the key. the feds know that. they invest BILLIONS into researching carefully thought out cause-and-effect reactions. they know exactly what to do to condition and train you into the right way of thinking.
Originally Posted by pisshead
how the fuck would drug cartels stay in business or make money to supply their criminal workforce if a pound of weed only costs five or ten dollars?
what do you think will happen when they finally push to ban abortion? we'll just have black market abortion clinics that endanger the lives of mothers and their children even further.
uncle sam doesnt give a fuck about you. wake up.
-
08-27-2005, 06:41 AM #58
Junior Member
Bush's War on Pot
You got it right, unlike most who I've conversed with in the past that think cannabis is illegal because of the 'moral majority', 'right-wing conpericy', 'fundmenatlist Christans' ect. The fact is that if drug legalization were with excessive haste the economic consequences would be prodigious to say the least. Just imagine how many people would find there carriers at an end. Tons of police, DEA, FBI, customs, and corrections officals would learn that their termination and the termination of the war on drugs are linked. Industries that supported government operations in the war on drugs would meet a fate similar to those who used to be responsible for fighting the war. When all the dust settled you'd probably have 100,000s of unemployed people looking for work. Lets not forget that some of our leaders love to point to drugs as the source of societies problems, but in many cases those problems are nothing more then the result of incompetent leadership.
Originally Posted by pisshead
This debauched and arguably dysfunctional system exemplifies some of the inherent flaws of statism. Initially statist operations like the war on drugs start off with the aim of correcting what are perceived to be real problems, and in some cases real problems are indeed solved. Unfortunately, archaic government agencies and policies, as well as many special interest groups and bureaucracies, always do whatever they can to find way to justify their continued existence. The people, who they were intended, serve usually start to suffer some degree of institutionalization , and thus find the prospect of removing them somewhat unattractive despite the fact that many of those same people realize, deep down, that theyâ??d be better off without them. (research how many people responded to the democratization of the former Soviet Union to get a better sense of what Iâ??m talking about, or if you want to understand it on a micro-scale research how some prisoners are afraid to leave prison after having been there for many years.)
-
08-28-2005, 02:04 AM #59
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
Originally Posted by Nicoli
you got pretty much all of that right. I think that if weed and drugs were legalised you wouldnt have to get rid of the dea.
they could easily make it like the alcohol/tobacco task foce. Instead of having those guys fly in and shootup an innocent family, you could have them ensuring people dont go crazy. like enforcing a non-public consumption ban, or even going in and grabbing the occassional deadbeat dad who prostitutes his kids for a fix.
the government perpetrates an image of total social decline when in reality, if you take away the means of MAKING huge amounts of drug money and you leave people alone, most of them will be just fine.
-
08-28-2005, 04:02 PM #60
Senior Member
Bush's War on Pot
Now this is how this started:
Originally Posted by nicholasstanko
Originally Posted by pisshead
you're a slave, you have no right to property or privacy anymore. it's downhill from here, but it doesn't have to be. it's a covert coup on the republic, where we elect the new bosses, same as the old bosses.
or maybe i'm just really stoned.
My Response:
Must be some gooood shit!
Now I'm undercover CIA or DEA? Crack kills Nich. All your posts consist of the same crap: Fuck you, your an idiot, your DEA, your CIA, get a clue..BLAH, BLAH, BLAH....
It's going to be an absolute pleasure to have someone of your great intellect become a new U.S. citizen!
Now slooooowww down and read the above post...IT WAS A JOKE...GET IT...HA, HA...nobody was trying to squash your poor little rights!
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton : Two Families, Three Decades In The White House...
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 25Last Post: 01-17-2008, 04:27 PM -
Bush on CNN
By Marlboroman in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 07-20-2006, 12:55 AM -
Bush fucks up hydrogen cars! That's my Bush!
By Caruso329 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 5Last Post: 10-24-2005, 05:23 AM -
Bush claims Democrats are to blame for Bush's very Low Approval Rating
By XTC in forum PoliticsReplies: 7Last Post: 06-16-2005, 01:26 PM








Register To Reply

Staff Online