Security cameras proliferate in Manhattan

[pisshead]

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...3/?hub=SciTech

Security cameras proliferate in Manhattan
Associated Press

NEW YORK â?? Six could be seen peering out from a chain drug store on Broadway. One protruded awkwardly from the awning of a fast-food restaurant. A supersized, domed version hovered like a flying saucer outside Columbia University.

All were surveillance cameras and -- to the dismay of civil libertarians and with the approval of law enforcement -- they've been multiplying at a dizzying rate all over Manhattan.

"As many as we find, we miss so many more," Alex Stone-Tharp, 21, said on a recent afternoon while combing the streets, clipboard in hand, counting cameras in the scorching heat.

A student at Sarah Lawrence, Stone-Tharp is among a dozen college interns enlisted by the New York Civil Liberties Union to bolster their side of a simmering debate over whether surveillance cameras wrongly encroach on privacy, or effectively combat crime and even terrorism -- as in the London bombings investigation, when the cameras were used to identify the bombers.

The interns have spent the summer stalking Big Brother -- collecting data for an upcoming NYCLU report on the proliferation of cameras trained on streets, sidewalks and other public spaces.

At last count in 1998, the organization found 2,397 cameras used by a wide variety of private businesses and government agencies throughout Manhattan. This time, after canvassing less than a quarter of the borough, the interns so far have spotted more than 4,000.

The preliminary total "only provides a glimpse of the magnitude of the problem," said NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman. "Nobody has a clue how many there really are."

But aside from sheer numbers, the NYCLU says it's concerned about the increasing use of newer, more powerful digital cameras that -- unlike boxy older models -- can be controlled remotely and store more images.

The group expects to eventually publicize its findings to convince the public that the cameras should be regulated to preserve privacy and guard against abuses like racial profiling and voyeurism. Privacy advocates have cited a case earlier this year in which a police videotape that captured a suicide at a Bronx housing development later turned up on a pornographic Web site.

The NYCLU plans to post an interactive map on its Web site pinpointing the location of each surveillance camera, and it may include a feature for the camera-shy that would highlight the least-surveilled route between two points.

But the map could be obsolete on arrival.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority plans to spend up to $250 million to install new surveillance cameras in the city's vast subway system. The New York Police Department also has requested funding for about 400 digital video cameras to help combat robberies and burglaries in busy commercial districts.

Police officers already watch live feeds from hundreds of cameras in city housing projects throughout the five boroughs, where "they are a proven deterrent," NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said.

NYPD detectives also regularly rely on private security cameras to help solve crimes. After makeshift grenades exploded outside the British consulate in midtown Manhattan on May 5, they studied scores of videotape and concluded that a still-unidentified cyclist likely tossed the devices before fleeing.

In London, British police used videotape from some of their Underground system's 6,000 cameras to help identify the suicide bombers on July 7 and the suspects in a failed attack on July 21.

Elsewhere, Chicago recently spent roughly $5 million on a 2,000-camera system, which has been credited for reducing crime to its lowest point in some 40 years. In Washington, D.C., Homeland Security officials have announced plans to spend $9.8 million for surveillance cameras and sensors on a rail line near the Capitol. And in Philadelphia, where the city has increasingly relied on video surveillance, cameras caught a murder and ultimately led to the capture of a suspect.

The NYCLU's Lieberman concedes the cameras can help solve crimes. But she claims there's no proof that they deter terrorism or more mundane crime, and some critics say it just pushes crime to where the cameras aren't.

"No one's saying there should be no video cameras, but let's not look at them as a quick fix," she said.

Whether the cameras threaten or protect society, the interns have encountered hurdles in their counting.

At one point, uniformed officers outside the Federal Reserve Bank demanded identification and warned, "if the information we had fell into the hands of terrorists, it would be a problem," said Peter Pantelis, 20, a student at the University of Pennsylvania.

Susanna Groves, 19, of the University of Michigan, recalled finding herself staring up an ornate streetlight, convinced a hidden camera was snapping pictures of her.

"I know I'm getting paranoid," she said. "But I also know there are a lot of cameras out there."

pisshead Reviewed by pisshead on 08-15-2005. Security cameras proliferate in Manhattan http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1124107740310_73/?hub=SciTech Security cameras proliferate in Manhattan Associated Press NEW YORK â?? Six could be seen peering out from a chain drug store on Broadway. One protruded awkwardly from the awning of a fast-food restaurant. A supersized, domed version hovered like a flying saucer outside Columbia University. All were surveillance cameras and -- to the dismay of civil libertarians and with the approval of law Rating: 5

[pisshead]

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...localnorth-hed

Waukegan police set to install surveillance cameras
Federal grant to help purchase 2 like those in London, Chicago

By Barbara Bell
Special to the Tribune
Published August 15, 2005


The technology that helped police identify suspects in the London subway bombings last month is coming to Waukegan.

Police officials are planning to buy two portable video surveillance cameras that can detect gunshots and transmit live images wirelessly to the department's communications division and squad cars. Installation is scheduled for November.

The cameras, which are being purchased through a federal grant for about $30,000 each, will be able to pan, tilt and zoom and will be mounted on light poles. Similar cameras were in use in London when terrorists set off bombs July 7 and tried to detonate bombs July 21.

"It's basically another police tool," Deputy Chief Artis Yancey said. "It gives us the ability to direct manpower in an area where it's needed."

Jack Pecoraro, executive director of the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police, said the organization supports the technological revolution but acknowledged that finances and community needs will play a role in the pace of expansion.

He cited surveillance video from a nearby building that aided in the capture of suspects in the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City and Chicago's recent effort to target drug dealers.

"This is the public sector catching up with the private sector," Pecoraro said. "All private enterprises are using video cameras.

"You go into a grocery store, a drugstore, use an ATM, you're being videotaped."

He said criticism about cameras invading people's privacy is off base.

"These are being used in open public spaces," he said. "It's not like these are being pointed directly at homes or businesses. It's like having an officer up on a deer-hunting stand.

"It's not `Big Brother,' it's just another tool. It also frees up time for officers to get back to working in the community."

Chicago has more than 50 video surveillance cameras, and the number of police departments buying them is increasing, said John Firman, director of research for the International Association of Chiefs of Police in Alexandria, Va.

The association does not track how many departments have video surveillance cameras, but a 2001 report found that about 17,800 police departments were using closed-circuit TV to monitor community activity.

"Technologies are enhancing the police's ability to do their job," Firman said.

The cameras can help prevent crime as well as provide evidence by recording a crime, he said.

Pecoraro said technology won't be a top priority for all departments.

"I think you'll see more of it in the bigger cities because of the volume of service," Pecoraro said.

The technology also will help Waukegan police get a more accurate read on situations and should make operations more efficient and safer, Yancey said.

Waukegan will be the first community Lake County to install video surveillance cameras, Yancey said.

The cameras will be placed in high-crime areas, and their portability gives the department some flexibility, he said.

No matter how much cameras enhance a department's efforts, Pecoraro said they aren't going to change the fundamentals of police work.

"We're 200 years away from `RoboCop,'" he said. "I don't think we'll ever get rid of the need for officers on the street."