hey dark, i got a couple things for your packet. first i saw that your dad said it leads to violence? bullshit. tell him to do the research. back in the 1930's (i cant remember what exact year) weed was outlawed. my dad told me of how his dad and other black folks walked around with their pipes, toking away at any time of the day.

king cotton was the dominant company when it came to america's industrial needs. clothing mainly, it was just a huge monopoly. like microsoft. get the picture? but then all these other "software" and companies start showing up like lets take ibm for example. hemp would be one of the new competitors. it could be used for clothing, cooking oil, ropes, even fuel. there was a wide variety of properties it possesed that made it so useful. well king cotton didnt like this, so they promised to support judges senators and all that ect. with millions for their election campaigns if they were to outlaw it. and it's history from there. also, half-assed studies showed thatminorities (IE: negros and mexicans )became violent after ingestion of marijuana, more likely to commit a crime towards white people, and niggers more likely to rape white women. that's the truth.

maybe you could do more research on that and compile it into one dad-proof packet. you can also compare tobacco into the situation and how they're similar to king cotton. hope i helped a little, and keep doing research. oh and if your dad drinks or smokes, use it against up. im not trying ot get you to rebel! lol
TwoPacalypse Now Reviewed by TwoPacalypse Now on . HELP NEEDED!!! caught... again..... please take the time to read because i know that you people can help me in many different ways! and if any of you wanted to know im 16. where to start.... well 6 months ago or so my parents found out i smoke after me being narked on. i tried to talk to my dad about it, but thats where i need help. he had a packet handy he got from my school about why weed is bad, and i had barely any way to defend myself because it was full of info i had was not in the position to be able to prove wrong. Rating: 5