It appears the program determined the author's IP from the email address field? ... some things don't look right:

1. #120 "2003.03.11" ? Are you talking about a comment in your blog from March of 2003!? We didn't even use that IP until Jan-2004.

2. The IP is shown as 69.20.59.47, 69.20.59.47 with no reverse record even though the IP actually has one - or perhaps the reverse is forged to appear as the IP address ... if so, that's a new twist to bogus reverse records I'd not seen before.

Feel free to post more details, if any, regarding this matter - again, we don't spam, period.

Ron