The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition

[onwardthroughthefog]

well they need not loose a job
refocus that attention on the REAL criminals and make it safe to walk the streets for people without fear of rapes and murders happening to those they love I am scared to death for my kids when they go out and about.
if the police would be able to count on the system to keep rapist locked away im sure they go along with the plan to legalize and let them NOT chase smokers of a weed
and have them take up the space to house killers in prison
ask anyone with any sense
who ya want the cops to arrest a smoker or a rapist
who ya want in prison america?
medical cannabis use is something i feel i have the RIGHT to use
the laws must be changed
peace

I agree with you 100%. I just realize who has the ear of the current administration...and it ain't us.

onwardthroughthefog Reviewed by onwardthroughthefog on 07-21-2005. The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition http://www.mpp.org/reports/index.html Ending Marijuana Prohibition Would Save $10-14 Billion Annually ... Report Endorsed by Milton Friedman and More Than 500 Economists In "The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition" (released June 2, 2005), Dr. Jeffrey Miron, visiting professor of economics at Harvard University, estimates that replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation similar to that used for alcoholic beverages would produce combined savings and Rating: 5