My sister is a CUNT!!!

[muncheemama]

some 14 year olds are still watching pokemon and shit, not all are smoking weed and stealing dads porn....I remember being in the eigth grade and some of you boys were, well, weird. Some had those cheesy mustaches and some still sounded like 8 year old girls and barely hit 5 foot tall.

[florida boy 3]

don't be to hard on us muncheemama.

[muncheemama]

its ok, late bloomers....shit happens

[llamaman666]

girl...hooters is no strip bar. its fine

[ezjim]

yes, he is 14 and maybe he will be the milf-spanker you talk about....But the fact is that he should not have been used by someone to piss someone else off. Im sure he didnt mind it, but she knew that mom would. As a mother myself, when you trust somoene to take your child you expect them to do whats best for him. Also not all 14 year olds are on the verge of their sexual breakthrough.

maybe not 14 yr old girls but you show me a 14 yr old boy that isnt thinking about girls every minute of the day and i will show you a 14 yr old boy who probably aint going to be producing to many grand children

[muncheemama]

i didnt say that they werent jerkin their gherkin...I just meant that not all 14 year old BOYS are getting head. 14 is an akward age,you could be right in the middle of puberty or you could be waiting another year for it.

[FunkyMonkey]

I think a lot of you are missing the point a bit.
She didnt ask us to rate her on her decision to not allow her kid to go to hooters. It doesnt matter if you agree or not she is the kids parent and what she says is 'law'. Nobody should have done anything with her kid that she would not have approved of...especially he own sister....especially since it was known to her that it was not allowed. That action was unacceptable and anyone with kids of their own knows this. Its not up to her sister to alter how this child is being raised.

[ermitonto]

I think a lot of you are missing the point a bit.
She didnt ask us to rate her on her decision to not allow her kid to go to hooters. It doesnt matter if you agree or not she is the kids parent and what she says is 'law'. Nobody should have done anything with her kid that she would not have approved of...especially he own sister....especially since it was known to her that it was not allowed. That action was unacceptable and anyone with kids of their own knows this. Its not up to her sister to alter how this child is being raised.

Well said.

[ezjim]

i didnt say that they werent jerkin their gherkin...I just meant that not all 14 year old BOYS are getting head. 14 is an akward age,you could be right in the middle of puberty or you could be waiting another year for it.

it is deff a akward age you couldnt pay me to live through that again my oldest is 13 and every time the wind blows the poor lil dude gets a stiffy and to make it worse his mom just caught him doin it with his girl friend and now she wants me to chew him out for doin somthin that comes more natural than walking..i think mothers are more protective of thier boys just like fathers are more protective of thier daughters its always been that way

[Fengzi]

I think it would also be funny if less endowed (or otherwise unattractive) women sued them over unfair employment opportunities.

It's actually been done before and she lost. The judge ruled that Hooters waitresses were "entertainers" and as such it was not discriminatory to require a certain body type to "play the part".


I agree that she has every right to be pissed at her sister. It doesn't matter if the place is Hooters or Chuck-E-Cheese. If she didn't want her son to go there and her sister knowingly took him there her sisters a serious bitch.