Conspiracy Theories: For stoners only?

[nicholasstanko]

You know what mate? Don't worry about it. You've just obliterated what was left of the interest I had in your views. (shame)

Anyone else?

Hey what the hell did i do? I wasnt arguing or debating you i was well off your banter with pisshead and im posting my own shit. What is it about my new post you dont like though? I'm willing to discuss it. I re-read it and i dont see anything that makes it seem like im attacking (baiting) you.

nicholasstanko Reviewed by nicholasstanko on 07-10-2005. Conspiracy Theories: For stoners only? I've noticed a subtle increase in both the frequency and paranoia-factor of pisshead's posts. At first I found the articles enlightening but now they simply conjure up an image of some paranoid schizophrenic sitting at his computer shaking and jumping at the slightest sound. :confused: Are other political forums on non-cannabis sites like this (ie. the same kinda stories from the same sources)? The increasing extremities of the left-wing propoganda (come on, what else is it?) have got me Rating: 5

[Button Basher]

Urkle.... Oops! Sorry Nick, I totally thought you were pisshead just then . Lol, sorry man. Your alright!

Yeah, and sorry to pisshead too, got annoyed at your ASSUMPTIONS . I don't mean any harm, i'm just asking a simple question . Try not to get annoyed about it, I just want your views.

[pisshead]

Ooh err, touchy guy. Sorry for not attacking you personally (I assume that's what you were hoping for seeing as you replied as if I had).

I said 'Conspiracy theorist = paranoid pothead'. I have to use the terms 'liberal' and 'left' because there's no other quick way of categorising anti-Bush people. I didn't call you a liberal (check), I know what you categorise yourself as already but you post the anti-Bush material of which I was referring to. I don't even know anything about Bill Clinton , your confusing me there (ooh, this fuels my interest ).

Start again and try not to automatically assume i'm putting you down, it's not that hard.

Put simply, a self proclaimed pothead (ie, you or XTC or anyone else) posts thread after thread of crazy theories on a cannabis website. What are the chances it's going to be true? It's not a rhetorical question. The poster doesn't know for sure themselves (they're just posting the article) but they agree with it anyway.

To me, it does sound like bullshit, at least now it does. Countless whacky theories posted over and over, the shock value degrades after a while.

So let's look at the topic again (keep reading):
Are all political forums on non-cannabis websites like this? (ie. the same stories from the same sources) I read over and over the same unbelievable stuff. In the end, what is it actually doing for anyone?

And don't pass judgment on me because I don't take in everything you say. Your showing the same signs as the Republicans your so desperate to put down. Just answer the fucking question without being a smart-ass.

More then you get from me? What am I, your little messenger?

i used that to illustrate a real live example, not some hypothetical you want me to give you. i got the impression part of the reason for your post was my post on the london bombings, and how i don't believe it was muslims or "al-qaeda" and that makes me paranoid or somehow being informed by left-wing sites...whatever that means. i think it was british intelligence, with likely foreknowledge and assistance from their military industrial complex.

cui bono? i think it's fairly obvious.

you want me to answer: Are all political forums on non-cannabis websites like this?

why don't you look and find out. of course, the answer is no, they all aren't. they all aren't like this. there are bush loving forums and kerry loving forums and sociliast forums and probably nazi forums. forums for everything you could imagine. if you don't care to look into any of it, fine. but don't expect to answer my post which had audio evidence and admitted examples of drills such as bombs on tubes going off with the word bullshit as if that's any kind of valid refutation.

i'm sorry, but the feeling is mutual. i have no interest in your posts either if all you can say is it's bullshit, even with audio...and mainstream admissions...quite a few soures...

you're calling this guy running a drill involving a thousand people a liar. that's fine.

[Button Basher]

Hehe, you guys post too fast for me . By the time i'd replied to one post there were 3 more.

I'll wait before posting further thoughts.

[nicholasstanko]

aw cmon guys. let the cannabis flow through your lungs....

shit, i dont know if pisshead lives in his parents basement or not but i wish i had a basement. wouldnt have to go outside all the time.

[pisshead]

i live about 160 miles away from my parents. i graduated college and i have a job and i support myself, if it really matters to people.

i know rich and poor people who share a lot of the same views of how the world works.

[nicholasstanko]

pisshead and button basher: just make up and let's move on. i always assumed that button basher related more to our side than bush's. a civil war on our front isnt going to help.

ive got some backwoods and a shitload of weed...who's with me?

[Button Basher]

why don't you look and find out. of course, the answer is no, they all aren't. they all aren't like this. there are bush loving forums and kerry loving forums and sociliast forums and probably nazi forums and celebrity forums and baseball forums and gardening forums, forums for everything you could imagine. if you don't care to look into any of it, fine. but don't expect to answer my post which had audio evidence and admitted examples of drills such as bombs on tubes going off with the word bullshit as if that's any kind of valid refutation.

i'm sorry, but the feeling is mutual. i have no interest in your posts either if all you can say is it's bullshit, even with audio...and mainstream admissions...quite a few soures...

Chill your bad self. I'm no political activist (if you will) and thought you or XTC would probably know more about Internet political debates then I could research before I made this thread.

Basically I reconsidered my 'bullshit' remark, mainly because I used to take all your stuff in and was wondering why I didn't with your latest . I guess you could say i'm bored with it all. In my book, conspiracy theory = theory relating to corruption/lies in the media/politics (that's my definition). Sorry if you took it as an insult, you gotta remember we're of two different worlds.

Think of it like i'm asking you to elaborate on what you do here. I don't mind if your not interested in my posts (I myself only take note of something like 20% of the actual users on here), but then again i'm not on a mass political crusade .

Anyway, you answered my question already. I guess, this being a drug website I can expect views from all sides. You could say i'm sceptical on the subject. How do we tell the lies from the truth when there appear to be so many from both sides of the argument ?

Chill yourself pisshead, i'm very much on your side . All I do is read the articles you post, they're just getting a little crazy for me . Hope you'll excuse my snapping at you earlier if I excuse yours.

Cheers.

[nicholasstanko]

Chill your bad self. I'm no political activist (if you will) and thought you or XTC would probably know more about Internet political debates then I could research before I made this thread.

Basically I reconsidered my 'bullshit' remark, mainly because I used to take all your stuff in and was wondering why I didn't with your latest . I guess you could say i'm bored with it all. In my book, conspiracy theory = theory relating to corruption/lies in the media/politics (that's my definition). Sorry if you took it as an insult, you gotta remember we're of two different worlds.

Think of it like i'm asking you to elaborate on what you do here. I don't mind if your not interested in my posts (I myself only take note of something like 20% of the actual users on here), but then again i'm not on a mass political crusade .

Anyway, you answered my question already. I guess, this being a drug website I can expect views from all sides. You could say i'm sceptical on the subject. How do we tell the lies from the truth when there appear to be so many from both sides of the argument ?

Chill yourself pisshead, i'm very much on your side . All I do is read the articles you post, they're just getting a little crazy for me . Hope you'll excuse my snapping at you earlier if I excuse yours.

Cheers.

Personally I dont see how pisshead's posts are getting crazier it reads the same to me...(insert joke here)

Bottom line though...he does post really credible links so if anyones getting crazier its whoever supplies the info.

Now what about my backwoods and shitload of weed...nobody wants to get high?

[Psycho4Bud]

it's one website of dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens that i try to check out as often as i can. i have other things to do, but i like knowing what's happening to the world and the country.

You should try posting from one of the other dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens and dozens...WHEW....of sites for a change. Whenever you post...it comes right from pissplanet.com.

P.S. Next time, try typing over 60 sites instead.....could have got carpaltunnel!