IF it ever does take effect it will never fly...the 1st one they bust who's got the bucks to defend from the insanity will get it overturned in supreme court, either state or fed. it was already tried here in nevada when the powers that be found medical mj forced upon them (by the will of the people of nevada) and they tried everything they could think of to disrupt the new law and our lives. now evidence of recent use or evidence of unsafe driving is needed before dui can be charged...then they have to prove amounts in the system at actual time of the stop. it's still possible to get a dui charge but much harder for LEO to get mj on the ticket. they're usually pled down to unsafe driving at worst or whatever the minor traffic infraction that brought on the stop (they can not stop you on suspicion alone).

there have been govt studies done in great britain and australia that showed stoned (mj) drivers are actually safer than straight drivers and no comparison to drunk drivers...they figured we're aware we're unstraight thus consciously drive with more caution...probably right on there but i'd also add we're also more aware of our surroundings. these studies were posted at emery's site years ago but should still be able to be searched out.
del... Reviewed by del... on . DUID??? WTF??? I just finished reading the article "Law Makers Aim For Zero Tolerance Of Pot Smokers" and I'm pissed. They want to make driving stoned a 0 tolerance offence...meaning you're screwed if you get caught driving stoned...excuse me what??? I drive stoned everyday and have been for the last 7 years and I've never gotten into an accident or even gotten pulled over when I was stoned...granted I totaled my first car just 5 days after getting it...but I was stone cold sober...I was just being really Rating: 5