Quote Originally Posted by Torog
Howdy nicholas,

How do you know,that if there were any explosives pre-placed,that they weren't put there by the terrorists ? If I were planning to do such a thing,and wanted to be successful,I wouldn't rely on just the airliners. I would rely more on the explosives and use the airliners for dramatic effect.

Pre-911 security at the Towers,probably was lax and easy to penetrate..just like in '93,when the terrorists did place explosives in the basement.

Have a good one....
Hey Torog. With all due respects...that's pretty far-fetched. Remember the attack on WTC from few years prior? There's video all over the place. A terrorist isnt going to be able to plant a bomb in the middle of new york big enough to bring dow the towers. you and i both know it's ridiculous. if the plan was to knock the towers down and then they wouldnt have tried using a method that failed previously. also in oklahoma never came CLOSE to coming down.

You're right about lax security. BUT how come a bomb was never mentioned in the official report? the 9/11 commission spent millions of taxpayer money and they never mentioned a bomb. they tried to sell you an idea that it was the planes and only the planes. why would they do that unless they were trying to cover something up?

And i can tell you're pretty smart. Just think about the idea... you're a terrorist...you have this big huge plan to fly planes into the towers...and you're going to potentially endanger that plan by placing a bomb in the building hoping noone gets wise and evacuates? there's too much at stake. jihadists arent dumb like how bush paints them. anyone who's willing to blow themselves up isnt going to risk fucking up the job using a tactic that's failed numerous times.

They have steel buildings in the middle east that get bombed too you know. if they dont fall then how would you get the idea that an american made structurally reinforced building would?

Best regards