FDA to declare safe meat and milk from clone animals

[Euphoric]

Then you do not understand cloning. Is it your contention that if a hand-raised, grass-fed, free-range cow is cloned, and it's clone "offspring" is raised in the same manner, in the same environment, on the same feed then the meat from this clone will somehow be worse for you than the meat from its "parent"? Explain this, please. Or at least post links to clinical studies which demostrate this.

agreed.
maybe if we replace the term "cloning" with something more user-friendly there would be less arguments against it. u see the word "cloning" and you associate it with certain things, u see?
of course im personally against all factory farming techniques so it doesnt even affect my life.

The method most widely employed for cattle, pigs, sheep and other large food animals in the US involves driving a short spike into the brain at a high velocity. This kills almost instantaneously. It is highly likely that the animal is dead before it can even feel anything. Despite its gruesome appearance, it's really about as humane as its possible to be.

i disagree. there have been numerous reports that ive read that state that this method is not foolproof, or humane. something like 1 in 7 of the cattle are not killed instantly but instead are just really fucked up..

Euphoric Reviewed by Euphoric on 06-23-2005. FDA to declare safe meat and milk from clone animals wow, this can only do harm... FDA to declare safe meat and milk from clone animals Financial Times | June 22, 2005 By Clive Cookson Meat and milk from cloned farm animals is about to be declared safe for human consumption by the US Food and Drug Administration, one of the world's most powerful regulatory bodies. A favourable risk assessment from the FDA is expected to start the commercial exploitation of cloning to improve livestock quality around the world. Rating: 5