Quote Originally Posted by Beeblebrox.420
Nick, you're full of shit, my friend. You are right about ONE thing, however. It wasn't a Boeing 747 that hit the Pentagon, it was a 757 - a somewhat smaller aircraft. You need to understand that these places are made of ALUMINUM. When they hit a steel and concrete structure at 500 MPH, they essentially burst into little shreds. You're not going to see wing impressions, like you did with the Twin Towers (which were open-framed steel structures clad with glass, very different from the much more solid steel-reinforced concrete walls of the Pentagon). In the Pentagon impact, the wings essentially sheared off and were shredded with the rest of the plane, merely contributing to the widening of the hole.

The main problem with this, and nearly every ridiculous conspiracy theory out there is the fact that in order for it to work, one would need thousands or tens of thousands of people to keep quiet and cooperate. This just isn't going to happen. There are plenty of people who value truth above all, and would make sure the truth was known, consequences be damned. Especially with such a massive and traumatic event as this. The fact that there is ZERO credible evidence to support your theory speaks volumes to me.

[Mod Note]
Knock off the needlessly abusive attitude. You can argue with someone without the gratuitous name calling. If you can't be reasonably civil, we don't need you here.
Well looks like i pissed off a mod. But look man, with all due respect you're full of shit if you're going to accept that story. I never said anything about 757's or 747's in this post. I dont think it was either.

Yeh, the OUTSIDE is made of aluminum. But what of the insides? See you cant hold the story together. Every plane crash INCLUDING American Airlines leaves alot of wreckage. You know that! Now suddenly, the plane parts MAGICALLY disintegrate? Cmon.

Glad you brought up wing impressions. PLANES CANT LEAVE WING IMPRESSIONS. This isnt a cartoon! theyre made of aluminum right? exactly so they would be shorn off. especially if theyre flimsy enough to be shredded. And Ill bet you'd still sit there and say that a plane hits a wall gets shredded to bits and leaves a nice neat hole. Does that really make sense to you? "contributing to the widening of the hole" a nice neat spherical hole?

Yeh, the truth CANT be held quiet by everyone. That's why you have DROVES of CIA and FBI and technicians and firemen and police officers and witnesses who were THERE and WITNESSED the event stating that the official story doesnt stack crackers. I respect your authority as a mod but why do you say that noones said anything when they HAVE? Why do you have NYC with MORE than 50% of its residents saying they believe 9/11 was a sham. Surely first-hand witness accounts account for something!?! CNN and MSNBC arent telling you for a reason, HELLO! there run and sponsored by government agents in one way or another? Notice around election time when there are BIIIG donations to a campaigns cause?
nicholasstanko Reviewed by nicholasstanko on . What really Happened at the Pentagon? I have done my studies of the Pentagon strike on 9/11. This much I am for certain on, no Boeing 747 hit that building. I invite any of you to do a Google on this event. First off, many people say the plane skidded on the grass. Pictures and videos taken on that tragic day clearly show the lawn intact. Where are parts of the plane. Clearly, if a plane did hit the building, it would leave debris, there were none. Pictures taken in and out of the blast area prove this. The hole that crash made, is Rating: 5