Quote Originally Posted by unmeg
this really upsets me,not just the not guilty verdict.Most people look at this case with bias.Yes,we all know he is guilty,thats not the question at hand.Instead we should look at the case the D.A. presented wich was not that great of a case.I am not siding with the pervert,I have kids & he makes me sick.People should try to look at it like this.
If your local D.A. charged you with sales cause you had a scale & baggies,but no pot.
Then to top it off they have some Krak head eyewitness pointing his finger at you,saying yes sir he sold me pot.If we all put or Emotions on the back burner and remember that is a court of LAW not fellings.Maybe this tradgedy will make the over payed California law makers to step up with a "Michael Jackson" law Thou Shalt Not Sleep With Other Peoples Children.Now MJ is talking about touring in Europe & Asia,may I suggest that any resident of these countries should protest.The spot light is the last place that man deserves to be.just my opion.Peace
Dude, the jury said this themselves: what the fuck is wrong with a parent who lets their children stay with him overnight in the first place? Maybe they're the ones primarily at fault, assuming nothing sexual took place (which is what I believe). People don't understand that MJ has the mind of a little child. Do a little research, try to get to know him. I think he thought of these kids as friends more than anything else, and because of how he is, he didn't bother to realize that him spending time with little kids is not the best thing for his image. No, I don't think that having spent the time with the kids in the first place is right, not at all, but as far as the law goes,- he didn't necessarily break it.