Bush Impeachment: Read This. Will he last till 2008?

[BlueCat]

ahh but the left hand knows full well what the right hand is doing...and we aren't going to let him get away with it! Its time to amputate....lol
You are right...everything they say about Iraq is to cover what they are actually doing..making a profit....

[nicholasstanko]

and it amazes me that if you look back historically...the government has lied before...why should it stop now? I don't know why you find it hard to believe.

What you missed in that report you posted is that the UN was complaining that THEY had satelite monitoring equipment on the dual-use equipment and materials...they were watching it. After the US invaded the UN lost its ability to monitor and the stuff disappeared....most of it was outdated and as for chemical weapons...the things that they did have were outdated and past the expiration date....it was no reason to invade.

In his final word, the CIAâ??s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has â??gone as far as feasibleâ?� and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

maybe you should read the CIAs report....

http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/

I was going to rebut with that same arguement thanks for the break

[BlueCat]

No problem...

[makor01]

i sure as hell didnt vote for bush...nor do i support him...i sure hope they kick his ass out in 2008.

[Fengzi]

Maybe there is hope after all. I just read a Washington Post article that states people here are starting to turn away from the omnipotent one.

*Nearly three-quarters of Americans say the number of casualties in Iraq is unacceptable

*For the first time since the war in Iraq began, more than half of the American public believes the fight there has not made the United States safer,

*two-thirds say the U.S. military there is bogged down

*six in 10 say the war was not worth fighting

*More than four in 10 believe the U.S. presence in Iraq is becoming analogous to the experience in Vietnam.

*52 percent -- disapprove of how Bush is handling his job, the highest of his presidency

*62% disapprove of the way Bush is handling social security

Here's a link to the article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...060700296.html

[Button Basher]

Wahay!! That's good news! Good old yanks.

[makor01]

...*two-thirds say the U.S. military there is bogged down...

thats the TRUTH there man...were so up to our necks in shit in iraq, there is no easy way out now.

[XTC]

Amsterdam is right, Bush has too much power in the branches and in Congress. He could whipe his ass with the Consititution if he wanted to and still remain in office.

[Marlboroman]

We have had bad men in power for so long we no longer know what a good man is suppossed to do with power.

[Goodman3eb]

The difference between Iraq and Vietnam is that we're not just helping one side of a civil war, we started the war, and we simply CANNOT withdraw without losing face; well, I say fuck it, let's lose face and get the hell out of there!

On a side note, read this quote by Goering, a high-level Nazi under Hitler, and tell me Bush's regime isn't the new Naziism:

aturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.