Results 1 to 2 of 2
Hybrid View
-
06-07-2005, 03:16 PM #1OPSenior Member
Surveillance Cameras Catch Gum Droppers In Britain
oh, the cameras are for traffic...oh wait, now they're for watching us, and now everything is a criminal activity...
victory cameras!!! i say life in a freedom prison camp for anyone caught dropping gum.
[align=left]Surveillance Cameras Catch Gum Droppers In Britain[/align]
[align=left]Manchester Evening News | June 7 2005[/align]
[align=left]Comment: The true purpose of widespread surveillance cameras is right before us. The intention is to monitor behaviour and then define that behaviour as criminal. Today it's dropping gum, tomorrow it could be the way you walk. Remember Admiral Poindexters gait analysis program? It studied the way people walk and their likelihood of being terrorists.[/align]
[align=left]WARDENS have issued the first £50 fine for dropping chewing gum in Manchester as part of a new Big Brother-style litter clampdown.[/align]
A man was caught on surveillance cameras spitting out the gum in Piccadilly Gardens. CCTV camera operators saw the incident and alerted city centre wardens, who were given a description of the offender. They approached the man and issued him with a £50 fixed penalty notice. It is understood he plans to appeal.
Manchester is one of three cities chosen by the government to use on-the-spot fines to tackle the problem of chewing gum stuck to the pavements.
The penalty scheme has been introduced in a 30,000 square metre area of the city centre covering Piccadilly Gardens, where slabs were cleaned of gum a few weeks ago.
A grant of £100,000 has been handed to Manchester city council to cover the costs of the scheme, which is backed by the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
Support has also been given by the Local Government Association, Keep Britain Tidy, the Improvement and Development Agency and chewing gum manufacturer Wrigleys.
Tough
The campaign began with the issuing of 5,000 gum and butt pouches, known as "stubbies", to passers-by and shoppers. The M.E.N. asked city centre shoppers what they thought of the get-tough drive.
Gavin Sykes, a 27-year-old bookmaker from Levenshulme, said: "I think the idea of fining people is spot on. I don't think it's too harsh because asking people not to drop gum in a pleasant way doesn't always work."
Gemma Brooks, 20, a social services worker from Bolton, said: "It's a good idea as long as everyone knows about it. I don't know how I would feel if they introduced it in Bolton though."
Council Director of Operations Pete North told the M.E.N.: "We are absolutely committed to tackling crime and grime in this city. We find that as soon as you tackle one area, like flyposting, people want to know what we are doing about litter and chewing gum.
"We are going to compare the different approaches, fining people, cleaning the streets, and advertising, and see what works best. If fining is the best deterrent, it could be rolled out to different parts of the city."
Leave a comment at the website opposing this madness.pisshead Reviewed by pisshead on . Surveillance Cameras Catch Gum Droppers In Britain oh, the cameras are for traffic...oh wait, now they're for watching us, and now everything is a criminal activity... victory cameras!!! i say life in a freedom prison camp for anyone caught dropping gum. Surveillance Cameras Catch Gum Droppers In Britain Manchester Evening News | June 7 2005 Comment: The true purpose of widespread surveillance cameras is right before us. The intention is to monitor behaviour and then define that behaviour as criminal. Today it's dropping gum, Rating: 5
-
06-07-2005, 03:24 PM #2OPSenior Member
Surveillance Cameras Catch Gum Droppers In Britain
Every major city in America is getting the same freedom as well...
[align=left]Hollywood Foots Bill for Spy Cams[/align]
[align=left]Wired News | June 7, 2005[/align]
[align=left]LOS ANGELES -- Every 10 feet or so in Santee Alley, there's someone standing behind a cardboard box full of discs. Each mumbles the same mantra: "DVD, DVD, DVD, DVD, Estar Guars" -- Spanish for Star Wars.[/align]
They're DVD bootleggers, and they're the target of a new system of surveillance cameras recently installed by the Los Angeles Police Department with money from the Motion Picture Association of America.
The MPAA, which represents major movie studios, contributed $186,000 toward the cost of the cameras and a software monitoring system that detects human movement.
The devices beam video to the LAPD's Central Area station, where the software alerts officers to activity. If there's rampant selling of bootleg DVDs, undercover police are dispatched to the site.
At a press conference announcing the project last Tuesday, LAPD chief William Bratton reported that four cameras are already operating, and there are plans to install six more in coming weeks throughout the area.
"These cameras ... will help (the LAPD) to lift a rock and shine a light on rampant counterfeiting of DVDs, which used to take place in the dark shadows," MPAA worldwide anti-piracy chief John Malcolm told Variety last week.
At the press conference, Bratton said news of the system was spreading quickly among bootleggers, and that a chilling effect on sales had already begun.
Santee Alley was reportedly selected because the area is frequented by naive tourists who are easy targets for pirates, Bratton said. The MPAA claims DVD piracy costs Hollywood billions of dollars each year in lost revenue.
But a visit to Santee Alley suggests that the trade in bootleg DVDs is no more of a threat to the movie industry's theatrical sales or DVD revenue than the $20 "PREADA" handbags or $9 "Ray-buns" sunglasses are to their high-priced, authentic cousins on Rodeo Drive. With the new MPAA/LAPD surveillance system, another small chunk of everyday privacy has been jettisoned in the name of protecting movie industry profits.
The LAPD refuses to say where the cameras are installed. When asked, officer Grace Brady said the department will not disclose their whereabouts. So I visited the area on foot to try to find the cameras.
On this shadow-free, sunny Saturday, movie vendors are clustered as close as 5 feet apart in some spots. During this and many prior visits to the area, I've encountered few tourists. Spanish-speaking residents from the neighborhood are in the majority.
The first DVD vendor drags a garbage bag full of Spanish pop-concert videos and bad-quality copies of American blockbusters including Revenge of the Sith. The box art is poorly photocopied. Typos and mismatched credits abound. The Star Wars box bears the credits from Armageddon, and a box promising the as-yet-unreleased Fantastic Four (due in theaters July 8) lists details from Bulletproof Monk.
I ask the seller if he knows about the surveillance cams. He frowns, ignores me and turns toward an approaching stream of potential customers.
A few paces away, I meet a second vendor selling similar fare. I purchase two DVDs, and ask him about the cameras. He stares. I tell him I'm a journalist and not a police officer, and after some silence, he points to the tall sign on the Bendix building. "Under the letter 'B,'" he says in Spanish.
Twenty feet away, a third seller totes movies in a torn cardboard box.
Some other vendors tell me where to find the spy cams. One device is planted on an upper floor of the building housing the Nobell dress shop on the corner of Olympic and Maple.
Another is at the opposite mouth of Santee Alley, near the intersection of 12th and Maple streets. It's on the southwest corner of the Bendix building, on the 10th floor.
The cameras are easy to miss. They're inconspicuous and resemble light fixtures. On closer inspection through a camera zoom lens, the upside-down bowl housing appears to contain a swivel camera, presumably with the ability to zoom and pan left and right, up and down.
Later, I watch the two DVD purchases. The Star Wars disc is awful -- it's unwatchable. It's a copy of the infamous internet work print widely available on BitTorrent. A pair of time codes stretches along the upper frame. Battle scenes and explosions that looked dizzyingly lifelike in the movie theater are cruddy and distorted.
The DVD promising to be a leaked copy of the unreleased Fantastic Four movie is actually an unmarked DVD-R that instead contains the 1994 Roger Corman version, a turkey known as one of the ultimate awful movies of all time. And this copy is of equally horrendous quality.
At $5 each, my pirated purchases are no bargain. When the real movies come out on DVD, I'll be able to buy them for about $14, and they will look great.
Even if price were the only object, I would never return to Santee Alley to shop for movies. It's hard to believe the argument that untold scores of other sales disappear there, too.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Good Cameras?
By hempnation in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 1Last Post: 08-27-2007, 10:54 PM -
Digital Cameras
By OreO in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 14Last Post: 06-29-2006, 05:40 AM -
Houston Police Chief Wants Surveillance Cameras In Private Homes
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 02-23-2006, 04:19 PM -
Traffic cameras open door for more invasive surveillance
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 02-09-2006, 10:27 PM -
Cameras, Cameras, Everywhere!
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 09-27-2005, 06:25 PM