Results 1 to 10 of 18
Threaded View
-
07-27-2005, 02:19 AM #18
Junior Member
supreme court rules AGAINST medicinal marijuana
The Dredd Scott decision precipitated the first Civil War back in the 1860's... which was all about states' rights. Perhaps the Raich decision will be seen by history to be a landmark case as well. How much will shit from the federal government will we take before we've had enough? Is it possible to motivate all of us lazy potsmokers to stand up for what we believe in, or is fear of persecution staying our wrath? Where would the boundaries be drawn if it's fought on the issue of pot? Can't be north/south this time around. May be much more splintered. Revolution was easier to stage when everyone had a common enemy - the British. Civil War was simpler when slavery (which was a necessary economic evil at the time for the south but not the north) was the polarizing factor. Pot is loved and hated by people in all states of the Union. Where do you draw the lines?
Originally Posted by hardon
Similar Threads
-
California Medical Marijuana Heads To State Supreme Court
By painretreat in forum Southern CaliforniaReplies: 4Last Post: 05-05-2013, 08:03 AM -
Supreme Court Will Not Review California Medical Marijuana Law
By Galaxy in forum LegalReplies: 0Last Post: 05-18-2009, 04:24 PM -
Supreme Court Rules Against Bong Hits 4 Jesus
By RamblerGambler in forum Current EventsReplies: 26Last Post: 06-26-2007, 06:04 PM -
Supreme Court Rules No Whistleblower Protections
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 06-02-2006, 11:22 AM -
Montel Williams on the US Supreme Court Medical Marijuana Decision
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 5Last Post: 06-21-2005, 03:05 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online