Quote Originally Posted by pisshead
i would agree. equal rights, not special rights.

and how about it's none of the government's business who marries who...having a license to get married is just ludicrous...it has nothing to do with the government.
Depends on your definition of "special" rights. I keep hearing all this bullshit about hate crime laws being hypocritical. In an ideal world, people would never be the targeted for violent crime because of their sexual orientation. But you and I both know this is far from a perfect world, so special measures need to be taken to protect our minority groups.

Marriage has been abused by heterosexuals for years, I don't see why we can't give homosexuals the same right to commit adultery, spousal abuse, and divorce as they see fit.
Stedric Reviewed by Stedric on . Navajo's Override Gay-Marriage Ban Veto Navajos Override Gay-Marriage Ban Veto June 04, 2005 3:51 AM EDT ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. - The Navajo Nation's tribal government voted Friday to override its president's veto of a measure banning same-sex marriage on the nation's largest Indian reservation. The Dine Marriage Act of 2005 defines marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman. It also prohibits plural marriages as well as marriage between parents and children, grandparents and grandchildren, brothers and sisters and other Rating: 5