Quote Originally Posted by BlueCat

FREEDOM is not what happened in Iraq. The Iraqis had no choice, because it was the U.S. government that decided to 'liberate' it. Now, they're faced with what could be a full-blown civil war. Bush thinks it's going to work out, but most experts don't agree.? His own military has told him it is not working. It won't matter one way or the other for Bush. It is no skin off his back. He makes money and he sure won't be fighting or sending his spoiled little brats to fight.
No Freedom? I guess the open elections was a big hoax put on by Fox and GW.

Full blown civil war? 20% of that country is Sunni and out of that 20% it is a smaller percentage involved in the chaos. Zarqawi is a Jordanian....I thought civil war consisted of a countries actual residents going at it, not a groop of uneducated Jihadists from different countries. Get a grip, things are booming in the Kurdish north and also in the Shiite south.

Insurgency is a part of history. Look at the south after the civil war in the U.S. There were people riding horseback wearing the ears of people around their necks if they didn't agree that everyone was entitled to at least one slave. Guess we should have left the south alone....we created a "conflict" by not letting them suseed from the Union.
How about Germany post WW2? The former SS formed a group called the wolfpack that killed many people in the same fasion for cooperating with the allied forces. Guess we should have let Hitler maintain Germany.

Things are SOOOOOO bad in all of Iraq? read this!
http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2005/0...q-part-25.html

There are 25 excellant updates telling of the progress made by the Iraqi people. Of course, some would like to believe that the murdering of Kurds and Shiites. The raping of school girls by Sadamms boys. Paying for martyrs. ETC...This was ALOT better than GWs war.