Quote Originally Posted by nicholasstanko
I know this is a pretty common discussion on these boards but what about this pentagon stuff? This is a pretty heated debate but i had like a couple questions...

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77.htm

1) Now when you look at the footage photo of the crash how come you only see a little tiny bit of what looks to be a shredded up diet pepsi can but no other wreckage?

2) How can we really trust "eyewitness reports" about an AA flight crashing...in fact how come we never even saw these people again to give interviews on national television?

3) Sure the black boxes were recovered...but that doesnt necessarily mean that it was recovered at the crash site. In fact, isnt america advanced enough to make their own black box?

4) How come there's no surveillance videos of the plan flying directly over the interstate? If you think about it, it should have flown right over a bunch of cameras.

5) Judy Biggert is a lady who identified bits of wreckage like a plane seat and so forth...but that was DAYS after the crash. If the conspiracy theorists are right then doesnt that mean the government can dummy up some fake crash wreckage when they realised that most people couldnt be duped so easily?

6) I know you still have passengers to worry about...what happened to them? Well...for all we know they could have been martyrs for the cause. Gas 'em and then when they fall asleep crash the plane.

Im not saying im siding with the CT's but... it does make me wonder because we're talking to the same US gov. that always lies or gives mistruths whenever the heat is on and the same government that admitted to feedinf radioactive materials to retarded kids way back in the fities. i think it was because they were experimenting with the idea that if you ingested nuclear materials they give you super powers or something. I'm just saying look...with the emergence of all these documents and memos that basically cite bush as a liar and all that...isnt it MAYBE possible?

I have absolutely no evidence to support anybody's claims but cmon guys...why should we need evidence to investigate a possible question?
I always use to wonder about the pentagon attack. It is obviously still a conspiracy, seeing as how most questions still go un-answered. I used to think it was a missile of some sort, but after i saw a more detailed site, i started thinkin a lil bit. The most obvious evidence that a 757 didnt hit the pentagon was the lack of debree, there was barely any, just a big ass whole in the wall, also, if u look at pics, the grass surrounding the wall is untouched, which is a bit odd. However, if you look at this site, it may change your mind.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html