Quote Originally Posted by Mojavpa
Yup. I agree with everything blue said. The neocons have been setting their sights on the middle and and the world since the first Bush adminstration, When the soviet union collapsed, Wolfowitz, Rumseld and the rest of them thought it was the perfect opportunity to begin military operations around the world.
The Soviet Union was never much of a real threat. "The cold war" is much more an ideological construct than is ever admitted, as the real 'war' was against independant nationalism. American imperialism came of age immediately after WWII and not after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The neocons might put their own ideological spin on it, but the American empire has been around quite a good deal longer.

Quote Originally Posted by Button Basher
The hilarious thing is, THEY DIDN'T!! America's best friends Afghanistan did.
Afghanistan didn't attack the US either (I assume you're talking about 9/11).

Quote Originally Posted by mellow mood
thx for the answers! so they actually atatcked for oil...
I think that's a bit oversimplistic. The issue isn't access to oil, or even control of that oil by American capitalists per se (though that is, of course, a major component in a more general and diversified strategy of domination). The paramount impetus was consolidation of empire. The general strategic advantages supersede oil as a material prize.
ihateapplesandsalt Reviewed by ihateapplesandsalt on . Why did america atatcked iraq? Sorry to post another thread about this subject, but id just like to have a clear answer: why did america attacked iraq, and will probably soon attack iran?? plz dont tell me to find massive destruction weapons, tons of countries have nuclear weapons, just like france, north korea, china, etc etc etc why did they spent over 100 billions of $$$ on this war, if there would be no profit done at all at the end?? only if the only beneficier could be bush? plz a simple answer i guess most of Rating: 5