so whats wrong with being a liberal?

[amsterdam]

those wto protesters do a great service to people and make their cause look real positive.smart people.

[BUZz UK]

[QUOTE=Torog]The Left,continually promotes hedonism and narcisism QUOTE]
lol, since when? it would be good though...

[amsterdam]

Not doing well today...I will get back to you...but heres a little to chew on...
The history channel had a great show on the truth about Lincoln the other night ...you should look for a repeat....Oh and BTW those same Iraqi women you "allowed" to vote as if that is our job to do....you guys always avoid the fact that your reason for invasion was WMD that did not exist...but tell a lie enough times....anyway those same women are throwing rocks and cocktails at the Army doctors and nurse vechicles as they go from one spot to the next...yelling GET OUT AMERICANS! One soldier got his legs almost blow off today...the armour saved him but he is still a mess. Just got that report first hand...THEY the IRAQI men and women want us out and the soldiers want to leave...so its not rocket science....a 2nd grader could figure out what to do next...
And please don't stand around waving your flag unless your willing to stand in the line of fire...

heres a little about your beloved republican.....

Many people believe that even in the darkest days of the Civil War Lincoln was steadfast in his resolve to free the slaves. Nothing can be farther from the truth. He had slaves and was known to use racial slurs a lot...
Lincoln was walking a political tight rope. He had to keep his powerful abolitionist supporters happy, but was fearful of losing the support of the loyal border states whose economy was still based on slavery. His real resolve was to win the war. He had to balance the support of those who wished to destroy the South with those who were increasingly alarmed by the bloodshed and looked to comprise as a solution to ending the war.

The biggest myth about Lincoln was that he freed all the slaves. Actually Lincoln never did free all the slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation only proclaimed the slaves in all territories held by the Confederates free, but didn't free any of the slaves in the North. It also did not apply to the border states and their 300,000 slaves. It was just a political move to get support in Europe and to encourage the slaves to rebel and cause trouble in the South.


Later Cat

boy,there really are huge mass protests going on arent there?no.at least they can protest if they want without fear of having chemical weapons used against them like saddam did in the early 90's.

[amsterdam]

you must have just returned from iraq?i know the history channel really gives you a good ear to the iraqi street.have you even been to the middle east in the past two years?or are you just talking out your ass as usual?

[Kombucha]

It's funny how no matter how much evidence is placed in front of you nose, you can still continue to argue against it with absolutely nothing to back you up except for "funny" pictures.

Torog, you are so damned paranoid! I am liberal. I do not support terrorists. I do not support killing in any way. I dislike America, but I do not support physical attacks on it. Liberals do not automatically oppose America. Liberals do not support terrorism. Terrorists are extreme conservatives in general. The ones blowing people up in Iraq are clearly opposed to the changes. Therefore they are conservative. Grow up, and try using your brain for once, don't just spew your idiotic Southern paranoid bullshit everywhere.

[GHoSToKeR]

Right on, Kombucha!

[BlueCat]

Terrorists are extreme conservatives in general. The ones blowing people up in Iraq are clearly opposed to the changes. Therefore they are conservative. Grow up, and try using your brain for once, don't just spew your idiotic Southern paranoid bullshit everywhere.


perfectly said

[clevemire]

Personally for me, I'm an independent. I like it that way, I have a mind of my own and I like to use it as I see fit. I don't pick one side over the other, I never will. I look at the issues at hand, check to see who I think will do the best job based on their opinions, and previous record. Sometimes I'm on the red side, and sometimes I'm on the blue side, and some I vote for the independent. I think we all should vote that way, but it's just my opinion and I'm not trying to change the way anyone thinks. To each his own, to each his own that is what I belive, and I will stay that way. Be true to who you are, and that is all you can do. Bluecat, I support you b/c you feel strongly about your party. Awesome, you found something you believe in and you stick with you. Your being true to yourself, and that is all you can do. That is what I do too.

I'm with you 100%. I don't take sides, either. I fight for what I personally believe in, and I keep to myself. Classification is for the ignorant, who are too numb-skulled to take in and respect all of the differences between every human.

If a person spends too much time worrying about other people (what they are doing, thinking, feeling etc.), they will ultimately forget themself..

[del...]

So why do you all need guns then, if there's no gun crime elsewhere?

you must have missed it earlier...let me refresh your memory:

we own them because we can...what's so hard to understand about that? we still live in a somewhat free society...which also means we are still free to own firearms. period.

[Kombucha]

You must have missed my point. Amsterdam said that you all need guns to protect yourselves from other guns. Then he said all the gun-crime was in ghettos... That doesn't add up, I simply pointed it out.

Plus, just because you can do something, doesn't mean you have to to. I can stab myself if I want, but I'm not going to. I don't have to recycle, but I still do.

It's called being responsible.