Blood in the Water

[nicholasstanko]

amsterdam you must be some guy in the Presidential office getting electro-shocked into writing this. I can't believe that you're actually saying that the war is going better than anyone predicted. OF COURSE IT IS! of course if you take america into a less developed country with limited resources the war's going to go better for you guys. you'd probably have a risk of 100,000 dead IF iraq actually had weapons that were reasonably considered inflict some kind of semi-mass destruction. War solves all kind of problems huh? Its doing wonders for your ever-growing deficit and your reputation in the international community. Jesus, I was really going to hold my tongue but you guys are so frustrating and you're really reinforcing the stereotype that weed fries your brain. Im a firm believer that it doesnt but damn...you're really making me wonder.

[amsterdam]

amsterdam you must be some guy in the Presidential office getting electro-shocked into writing this. I can't believe that you're actually saying that the war is going better than anyone predicted. OF COURSE IT IS! of course if you take america into a less developed country with limited resources the war's going to go better for you guys. you'd probably have a risk of 100,000 dead IF iraq actually had weapons that were reasonably considered inflict some kind of semi-mass destruction. War solves all kind of problems huh? Its doing wonders for your ever-growing deficit and your reputation in the international community. Jesus, I was really going to hold my tongue but you guys are so frustrating and you're really reinforcing the stereotype that weed fries your brain. Im a firm believer that it doesnt but damn...you're really making me wonder.

war solves lots of things.

[bhallg2k]

War solves nothing. It just ends things. Huge difference.

[amsterdam]

no,it solves things for sure.

[amsterdam]

War solves nothing. It just ends things. Huge difference.

TYPICAL liberal shibboleth.

[amsterdam]

War solves nothing. It just ends things. Huge difference.

this is manifestly not true.violence ended the regimes of adolf hitler and benito mussolini.violence also proved equally effective against the taliban.

"But you cant impose democracy at gunpoint>" more bullshit!in reality,at the end of world war II ,america imposed democracy at gunpoint on japan and germany,and it proved a resounding success in both countries.

all you have to do is ,give guns a chance!!

[nicholasstanko]

i found your post with the thumbnail to be plain ridiculous. In fact it was funny to imagine you grinning to yourself thinking you had some amazing point. Well you don't. War didn't end nazism fascism or communism. All three are still regularly practiced today around the world. Any war that was ever started on this precedence had been started to supress its SPREAD. Let's not forget that america was quite content to let jews get exterminated all over the place until japan showed up. And as for slavery, you must be super high on paint fumes to think the union forces started an entire war JUST to end slavery. It was for control of the south and their agriculture. It was a nice consequence though.

[amsterdam]

hahahahahah,what the hell are you talking about?sure those things are still around,but they sure as hell arent a driving force??jesus!

violence took care of that.