Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
14309 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    By Michael Kilian
    Chicago Tribune

    May 6, 2005

    WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration took sweeping action yesterday to
    open nearly 60 million acres -- about one-third of the national forests
    -- to road construction, which in turn could lead to logging, mining
    and other commercial use of the previously protected areas.

    Though lawsuits are pending over the issue, the plan undoes the
    "roadless rule" that President Bill Clinton ordered in 2001 during his last
    days in office. The rule had banned further road construction in 58.5
    million acres of national forests, nearly all in Western states.

    In announcing the new policy, Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns, whose
    department includes the U.S. Forest Service, praised it as a
    cooperative and collaborative form of conservation.

    "Our actions today advance President Bush's commitment to cooperatively
    conserve inventoried roadless areas within our national forests,"
    Johanns said. He said that his department "is committed to working closely
    with the nation's governors to meet the needs of our local communities
    while protecting and restoring the health and natural beauty of our
    national forests."

    However, conservation groups termed it a giant step backward.

    "Millions of acres of our last wild forests are now immediately at
    risk," said Robert Vandermark, director of the Heritage Forest Campaign,
    who pointed out that 386,000 miles of roads already exist in the national
    forests. "This leave-no-tree-behind policy paves the way for increased
    logging and mining in much of the nation's last wild areas."

    Niel Lawrence, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense
    Council, said, "The president has replaced the roadless rule with the
    'treeless rule.' He has deprived future generations of their birthright and
    national heritage."

    Road-building and subsequent commercial uses could be started
    immediately in 34.3 million acres because the Forest Service has prepared
    management plans. An additional 24.2 million acres could be opened to road
    construction and commercial development, but governors have 18 months to
    file petitions to restore the "roadless rule" on sections of national
    forest in their states, or to offer new plans to allow and manage
    commercial uses.

    The states would have to work with the Forest Service and localities in
    drawing up such plans, and the Forest Service would have final say.

    The Agriculture Department said yesterday's action would require the
    federal government to "work with states, tribes, local communities and
    the public through a process that is fair, open and responsive to local
    input and information."

    In the past, federal conservation policies and initiatives have led to
    clashes with local politicians and interest groups that support
    commercial use of the forests to protect jobs and tax bases.

    Deb Callahan, president of the League of Conservation Voters,
    complained that the Bush administration is "selling out to the logging and
    timber industry" and that the president is opposing the will of the public
    on the roadless issue.

    "To date, the Forest Service has received a record-breaking 4 million
    public comments in support of the rule," she said. "The rule also enjoys
    broad support among members of Congress, governors, local officials,
    businesses, hunters and anglers, scientists, economists and religious
    organizations. ... It's time to stop the outrageous assaults on our
    national forests."

    Lawrence argued that the petition process called for in the Bush
    administration's initiative is pointless because ultimate authority over
    whether to allow roads and commercial exploitation remains with the
    administration.

    "The 'treeless rule' is about replacing real protections with a
    meaningless process," said the attorney for the Natural Resources Defense
    Council.

    But logging and union worker interests applauded the change.

    W. Henson Moore, president and chief executive of the American Forest
    and Paper Association, said the Bush administration has crafted "a
    thoughtful, legal and effective plan."

    "The courts struck down the Clinton-era rule," Moore said. "This new
    rule gives governors the opportunity to work with the Forest Service to
    identify special and unique places in their states and then create
    broadly supported plans for conservation and preservation."

    Michael Draper, vice president of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters'
    Western Region and chairman of an umbrella group that represents
    500,000 union workers, said: "The new rule returns the decisions that will
    guide management of the forests to the local level -- to the people who
    live near the land and know it, and its needs, the best."

    In announcing the action, the Agriculture Department said the new rule
    would remove legal uncertainties that have clouded the issue. In July
    2003, a federal district court in Wyoming struck down the Clinton
    administration's widespread ban on further road construction in the forests.
    That decision was subsequently appealed to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court
    of Appeals in Denver, which heard arguments in the case this week.

    In 2001, in a separate lawsuit over the rules, logging interests won a
    federal court injunction against the Clinton-era rule in an Idaho
    court, but that was overturned on appeal by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
    Appeals in San Francisco.

    Thirty-eight 38 states and Puerto Rico have national forest land at
    least marginally affected by the roadless rule, but 97 percent of the
    acreage lies in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana,
    Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.

    There are no national forests in Maryland. But an advocacy organization
    called the Maryland Public Interest Research Group issued a news
    release yesterday saying that 1.7 million Americans sent letters last fall
    urging the Bush administration not to abandon the Clinton-era
    protections.

    "Public support of this rule is unmistakable," said Brad Heavner,
    director of MaryPIRG. "But the Bush administration has chosen to ignore
    millions of comments that citizens have submitted."

    The Chicago Tribune is a Tribune Publishing newspaper. Sun staff writer
    Tom Pelton contributed to this article.
    XTC Reviewed by XTC on . No Tree Left Behind! By Michael Kilian Chicago Tribune May 6, 2005 WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration took sweeping action yesterday to open nearly 60 million acres -- about one-third of the national forests -- to road construction, which in turn could lead to logging, mining and other commercial use of the previously protected areas. Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    i love how liberals try to put the enviroment in there corner.we love trees as much as the next guy.
    \"even if one takes every reefer madness allegation of the prohibitionists at face value,marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could.\"

    William F. Buckley Jr.

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    I think it's hilarious how W's logging plan is called "Healthy Forests" and his deregulation of some air pollution laws is called "Clear Skies."

  5.     
    #4
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    yeah...the name of the program is always the exact opposite of its true intention...it's very orweillian.

    homeland security...doesn't keep us safe
    patriot act...nothing a patriot would do

  6.     
    #5
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    what are your ideas about helping the enviroment?
    \"even if one takes every reefer madness allegation of the prohibitionists at face value,marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could.\"

    William F. Buckley Jr.

  7.     
    #6
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    because most people know that the enviromentalist have no real or productive ideas.
    \"even if one takes every reefer madness allegation of the prohibitionists at face value,marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could.\"

    William F. Buckley Jr.

  8.     
    #7
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    Raise the National Gas Milage by two gallons within a few years.

  9.     
    #8
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    thats a good start,i am just sick of alot of this organic food growing idea and all the other bs that hurts more than it helps.
    \"even if one takes every reefer madness allegation of the prohibitionists at face value,marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could.\"

    William F. Buckley Jr.

  10.     
    #9
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    Grow pot...
    Good for da soil
    Can be made into fuel
    seeds are a healthy foodstuff
    fiber for paper (instead of cutting down trees which take much longer to replenish)
    Many economic benefits
    and a couple of other added benefits.

  11.     
    #10
    Senior Member

    No Tree Left Behind!

    growing organic food is bad?

    genetically modified food and pesticides must be good then?

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Up in a tree?
    By SmudgeSticky in forum Outdoor Growing
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-10-2009, 11:37 PM
  2. Pit In a Tree
    By SnSstealth in forum Pets & Animals
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-26-2008, 10:35 PM
  3. grow in a tree
    By iStaaHi in forum Growing Information
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-21-2008, 07:33 PM
  4. Looks like I'll be out of tree for a while :'(
    By Leebstatus in forum Experiences
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-16-2007, 08:11 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook