Quote Originally Posted by adsad
After using urineluck does the sample have high chromates or is the pH still off?
Both of these conditions have been exhibited. However, a sizeable percentage of the spiked samples get popped on the colorimetric assay for Oxidant/PCC, which is the initial screening panel for Chromium IV (chromates).

Quote Originally Posted by Mike8211
On the urineluck website they say its 99% effective. Why would they say that if it wasnt?
Can you say sales pitch?

Remember, youre dealing with a business whose reason for being is to sell products to consumers - and lots of them. It doesnt have to take an economist to realize that sales pitches are a business operators lifeline.

Quote Originally Posted by Mike8211
There are no current threads about anyone using the newest one. Only old ones from 5 yrs ago when it first began being unreliable. I wish someone would post current info on the state of urineluck
Thats likely due to people realizing that if youre going to sneak something in, it might as well be something thats going to work - a clean urine sample for a sub. These same people may also realize that its alot more easier to pour in a clean sub than to fumble around with 2 additive vials (not to mention the filled sample cup as well) in the bathroom stall.
Burnt Toast Reviewed by Burnt Toast on . Does urine luck additive work 2013 Hey was just wondering if i was better off using a synthetic urine or using an additive such as urline luck additive. Supposedly 7.1.12 additive is 99% effective. I work as a driver and i am subject to random lab tests. I felt great about quickfix 5.7 until my friend lost his correctional job for failing. I have quickfix 5.7. My friend was a co making 70k a yr and now drives a cab. I am in nj. So is my friend that failed. Thoughts? I would like to hear about this. Urine luck swears by this Rating: 5