Results 1 to 5 of 5
Threaded View
-
03-12-2013, 12:14 PM #5
OPJunior Member
Thoughts about this study regarding using creatine to mask a diluted sample
Yeah, I found that part to be a little bit of flimsy methodology. The subjects in the first study took 5g four times a day if I remember correctly. N2 suggests "creatine loading" which doesn't really help clarify anything. From what I could find on bodybuilding.com a typical "creatine loading" regimen was around 20g daily and then 5g daily as maintenance so this seems to reflect what was done in the study (see: Bodybuilding.com - Creatine: Beyond The Confusion!).
Originally Posted by Burnt Toast
Not really trying to attack N2's methods. I really hope they work effectively, just wanted to foster discussion about the fact that creatine may not be as effective as previously thought.
Similar Threads
-
diluted sample delay results?
By gravytrainer in forum Drug TestingReplies: 1Last Post: 08-29-2012, 09:56 PM -
Re-Test, Will it be observed? MRO says sample diluted.
By PassThatDoj in forum Drug TestingReplies: 5Last Post: 04-22-2010, 02:44 AM -
Not sure if my sample was diluted. Please help
By hehmke in forum Drug TestingReplies: 3Last Post: 04-28-2007, 10:54 PM -
Midstream Sample Vs. Endstream Sample?
By Tralala in forum Drug TestingReplies: 0Last Post: 03-03-2006, 09:52 PM -
To sample or not to sample.. that is the question!
By BobBong in forum Basic GrowingReplies: 5Last Post: 02-14-2005, 08:25 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online